The network boys showed a comparison of IU and Purdue "wins" several times. Showing the surprising (to them) results that Purdue had a clear lead over IU in head-to-head wins. Then Dicky V spouts off about the second line that says... Get this.... IU has 5 "National Championships" to zero for Purdue.
Now if I recall correctly, 2 of the 5 IU "Championship's" were just NCAA tournament wins that went back to a 16 team playoff, and were NOT considered an NC. Furthermore, Purdue does have one NC awarded back in those days when the Helms trophy was considered the NC. The stats should have read 3 to 1. I will give IU credit for the 3. Kind'a pissed me off to see more fake news TIC.
Now if I recall correctly, 2 of the 5 IU "Championship's" were just NCAA tournament wins that went back to a 16 team playoff, and were NOT considered an NC. Furthermore, Purdue does have one NC awarded back in those days when the Helms trophy was considered the NC. The stats should have read 3 to 1. I will give IU credit for the 3. Kind'a pissed me off to see more fake news TIC.