Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed
- Thread starter SqueakyClean
- Start date
no no no no...go thank chucky for his rule change. dems changed the rules. this revisionist history needs to stop.
You should say that to a rape victim’s face and see how that goes over.
Adoption or murder. Bad situation, but let's not sugar coat it. It is an option.
You have the wrong Dem, it was Harry Reid. He did because the Republicans filibustered every judicial nomination.
I wish we had a young female commenting on these solutions by a bunch of older men.
So McConnell ignored all that, now he's following it.
Yep, the Dems have changed their tune this time around. But they haven't been in charge during these two situations. McConnell has been. He's the one doing the 180, he's the one making the rules. Doesn't mean a damn thing what the Dems said now or then.
What’s the polling for this topic among women?
Republicans are all for individual freedoms... except in this issue.
This little fight is interesting. I wonder if Democrats are going to become single issue voters for the Supreme Court now? I know people on the left will be energized by this.
Cool, so if your daughter is raped and becomes pregnant as a result, your reaction is “it’s a shame you were raped and got knocked up, but now you gotta make a horrible choice. Sucks to be you”? Father of the year shit right there. Another crusty white dude trying to control women.
That was a senate with a Republican majority and a Democrat in the White House
So you tell your daughter "Hey let's just kill this innocent life and get on with ours!" That's murder shit right there. Control women? Please, that f*cking excuse is so old.
I would support my daughter regardless of her decision because she’s been placed in a horrific situation, and it’s not about me. And it’s clearly absolutely about control to you.
No. It's about the life of the unborn. I don't give a hoot about controlling women.
You give way more than a hoot based on the things you’ve said.
Yeah, about the unborn. Why is this so difficult to understand? I never said that in this instance is wasn't a difficult decision. But taking the life of an unborn, when adoption may be an option, is wrong.
Not really. It's a different situation. Last time it was the President & Senate controlled by different parties. This time it's the President & Senate controlled by the same party.
Before you all get your panties in a bunch about this, is there one of you that thinks Schumer wouldn't push a nominee through, if the Dems controlled the Senate and the WH now? You bet your ass he would and so will McConnell.
LOL, you had better take a long hard look at the country. It's NOT the Republicans setting things on fire. Poor choice of words, on your part.
I'm opposed to abortion, but I also realize that there is no way to get that genie back in the bottle. Realizing that it is going to occur, I'd prefer that it occurred in a clinical setting.
Rather than having government subsidized abortion factories , like Planned Parenthood, I wish that young girls got more education on the variety of options available to them.
I just thought about what a misnomer "Planned Parenthood" is, considering what they actually do. Shouldn't they actually be called Planned Avoidance of Parenthood?
When you come right down to it, Bush wasn't a Conservative either.
I'm sure the Dems will have 120% of their Registered voters sending in the Mail In ballots that seem to be flooding the country. This is going to be the most corrupt, longest election ever. Boss Daley would be proud.
Roe vs Wade is NOT a LAW. It was a Supreme Court decision made on questionable legal ground and passed 5-4, which is why it comes under so much scrutiny. Prima Facie case of legislating from the bench.
Obama could have done it in his first term, when he had essentially a super Majority in the House & Senate. He could have done a lot of things like Immigration Reform, but elected to keep the issues, rather than solve the problems.
Try to be realistic here. If Trump had been President at the point the Garland nomination was made and the Dems controlled the Senate, do you really believe Schumer would have allowed any nomination to go forward? Not on your life...
We’ll never know but we know what Mitch did and now how he is handling it: Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth,
Like I said we will likely be seeing a legislative solution. If you can’t understand why the legislature never wanted to tackle it just look in the mirror.
Okay..Daley has been dead for 50 years but I suppose this is the explanation for why Trump told the Pubs to vote twice in NC?
Lol I love how volcanic Trumpers are over every supposed liberal "hypocrisy."
In 2016, the voters needed to have a say in 9 months. But 45 days out in 2020, the 2018 voters (who significantly flipped the House and only gave the GOP two additional Senate seats in spite of an historically favorable map) already had a sufficient say SO WE NEED TO RAM THIS THROUGH ASAP.
Keep twisting yourselves into pretzels over this, suckers. Nobody who wasn't already a brainwashed Trumper is going to buy this nonsense.
In 2016, the voters needed to have a say in 9 months. But 45 days out in 2020, the 2018 voters (who significantly flipped the House and only gave the GOP two additional Senate seats in spite of an historically favorable map) already had a sufficient say SO WE NEED TO RAM THIS THROUGH ASAP.
Keep twisting yourselves into pretzels over this, suckers. Nobody who wasn't already a brainwashed Trumper is going to buy this nonsense.
Last edited:
Left to me, hyprocrisy or not, McConnel should do whatever he wants to do. Democrats then have a decision to make; They can stop being idealistic cooperators in this silly prisoner dilemma. There's no point upholding gentleman agreements if they other side won't. Once Rs push this through, Ds got to do their best to win the senate. And if they do, make the following changes:
- scrap the Senate fillibuster
- Add DC and PR as states, extend an offer to the other US territories
- pack the SC with whatever number gives you a considerable majority
- Extend the house to be more in line with propotional population representative.
done.
- scrap the Senate fillibuster
- Add DC and PR as states, extend an offer to the other US territories
- pack the SC with whatever number gives you a considerable majority
- Extend the house to be more in line with propotional population representative.
done.
So what crime is a woman guilty of who has an abortion? You are going to need to build a lot more prisons. I mean a lot more.
more short sightedness. just like rbg decision not to retire when Obama was in office. you keep thinking you can make a plot to win this imaginary future instead of just picking good candidates and governing effectively.
Mostly agree. Just hope a potential Majority Leader Schumer has the stones of Mcconnell.
Schumer and McConnell are no different. Either will use every possible edge to their advantage. Both will flip flop as often as necessary to justify their positions,
Similar threads
