All great choices. For the money, Kyle. He makes like 500K where Lester makes 20M and Arrieta makes 10M. For passion, gotta take Arrieta. But can't ever pick against Lester.... he's the Schilling of this years Cubs team. Really no wrong choice with any of those three. Good time to be a Cubs fan! This has to be their year.
Boy is it hard being a Purdue and Cubs fan.
Tough call between Lester and Arrieta...I am not the biggest Lester fan, but he has been outstanding this year for the most part, and far more consistent than Arrieta...plus, he has had some quality post-season experience and success.No cop outs! You're the manager and all three are rested for a must-win game 7. Who are you sending out there?
Stop this. I can't stand that people compare the Cubs and Purdue. I get it, but the Cubs have so much more going for them than Purdue does.
Yes, the Cubs haven't won a WS title in 100+ years, but the Cubs are one of the most historic programs in all of SPORTS, they play in a huge market, and can attract just about any Free Agent.
Being a Purdue fan is more equivalent to being a fan of the Brewers.
Which makes it even more hilarious/pathetic that the Cubs haven't won it since 1908. That's beyond terrible.
I'm a White Sox fan so I love that it's been since 1908. However, if they do win this year I'm never going to hear the end of it from my Cubs friends! This has been a very looooong summer for me.Yeah, but baseball is more of a crapshoot than any other sport, in the playoffs.
You take a 162 game season and condense it down to best of 5 and/or best of 7 series? That's a recipe for a crapshoot.
But yes lol I think it's very sad they haven't won a WS since 1908.
I'm a White Sox fan so I love that it's been since 1908. However, if they do win this year I'm never going to hear the end of it from my Cubs friends! This has been a very looooong summer for me.
As a diehard Cubs fan (although I do like the Sox as well, and am a Yankees fan (as a Cubs fan, you have to have a team that you like/root for that actually has a chance to win), think of just how long (and enjoyable) the winter will be for you IF the Cubs don't win THIS year with respect to how things have gone and played out thus far.I'm a White Sox fan so I love that it's been since 1908. However, if they do win this year I'm never going to hear the end of it from my Cubs friends! This has been a very looooong summer for me.
Totally agree...just had that same conversation with my son tonight...they are play-off tested and experienced, and, if they win tomorrow night, the Cubs will see Cueto on Friday and Samardzija on Saturday...and head to SF then and get Bumgarner on Monday...they could just as easily win that series as they could be swept.Just hope the Cubs don't face the Giants. They are putting it together again for a long playoff run.
And unfortunately I AM a Purdue and Brewers fan.Stop this. I can't stand that people compare the Cubs and Purdue. I get it, but the Cubs have so much more going for them than Purdue does.
Yes, the Cubs haven't won a WS title in 100+ years, but the Cubs are one of the most historic programs in all of SPORTS, they play in a huge market, and can attract just about any Free Agent.
Being a Purdue fan is more equivalent to being a fan of the Brewers.
And unfortunately I AM a Purdue and Brewers fan.
Cubs have their work cut out for them certainly...in my mind, Game 1 is huge.All I can say is....
Why couldn't the Mets have won!
Drawing the Giants was not ideal.
It is a five game series.Agree here.....though, one would expect the Cubs to be favored, the Giants seem to get on these "rolls" every other year ('10, '12, '14), ignited by a dominant pitcher. Having to use Bumgarner in the WD game I think is probably the difference. I'll say the Cubs in six.
It is a five game series.
It has the makings of a good series certainly.I'm not a fan of either but I'm looking forward to the series. I give the Cubs an edge primarily because of their bullpen. Giants bullpen is not good and that will get exposed when Bumgarner doesn't go CG shutout for them.
A huge bonus that the Cubs will only have to see Bumgarner once in the series, but, they need to take advantage of that obviously.Agree here.....though, one would expect the Cubs to be favored, the Giants seem to get on these "rolls" every other year ('10, '12, '14), ignited by a dominant pitcher. Having to use Bumgarner in the WD game I think is probably the difference. I'll say the Cubs in
four (edited.....thanks to NVB)
It has the makings of a good series certainly.
The Cubs bullpen is a huge question mark...lots of big arms, and capable of being dominant, but Strop is coming back from injury, as is Rondon (who has scuffled a bit and is pitching in a new role), and Chapman has not been as lights out as one might expect. They have depth and quality arms, but they have been pretty inconsistent.
Problem is that Bumgarner is not just capable, but almost likely (especially if necessary) to throw a CG, and potential CG shutout...should be a great matchup in Game 3 between him and Arietta.
If this series goes 5 games, I look for Samardzija to have a short leash and for Bumgarner to take over.
Agree...and had mentioned that in another post in this thread, as a huge break to only see Bumgarner once in the series...that said, if they lose twice in Chicago and then see him in SF on Monday, it is almost a moot point.Agree but with Bumgarner only getting one start in the series then the Giants have to win 2 games with their other starters.
As far as the bullpen, I believe the Cubs bullpen is far better than Giants. It's not perfect and I believe Chapman might ultimately blow a game or two in the postseason (depending on how deep they can get) but the Giants bullpen has been horrific. The Cubs may look back and wish they had ponied up a little bit more for Andrew Miller when all this is said and done because as a Yankees fan he always felt like the most reliable guy to me and he has some postseason experience to draw on.
I thought that I had already saw Cueto in Game 1, Moore in Game 2, Bumgarner in Game 3 and Samardzija in Game 4 (tentatively).I don't see Samardzija starting a Game 5. I would think that game is Cueto's because I don't think they bring Cueto back to pitch Game 4 on 3 days rest. I haven't seen the SF starters for Games 2 or 4 yet but my guess is that they go with Samardzija for game 2 (since he's familiar with pitching in Wrigley although I'm not sure how he's done against the Cubs since he got traded away) and Moore for Game 4 (his home/road splits were very favorable to home at least when he was pitching with Tampa).
If it does go to 5 games, Bumgarner would be on 2 days rest so I could see them using him for an inning or so but I doubt he'd go much longer than that. He's only 27 so they aren't going to want to risk major damage to his arm in a divisional round playoff series.
I see this series as 3-1 Cubs with the Giants taking the Bumgarner game. I think the Giants take a lead into the 8th/9th inning in one of the first two games in Chicago and their bullpen blows it.
I'm not a fan of either but I'm looking forward to the series. I give the Cubs an edge primarily because of their bullpen. Giants bullpen is not good and that will get exposed when Bumgarner doesn't go CG shutout for them.
Giants bullpen for the playoffs will not be the same as for the regular season. So I disagree that it is not good. They will be tough on the Cubs. And Moore will give the Giants 3 quality starters for these games. The travel days spread it out so these 3 will pitch more than you are expecting.