His over the head no look layup was #1 on Sportcenter top ten plays this morning. Props to him and the Boilers. BTW.....Good rebounding game by him.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His over the head no look layup was #1 on Sportcenter top ten plays this morning. Props to him and the Boilers. BTW.....Good rebounding game by him.
so it was the First Nojel.His over the head no look layup was #1 on Sportcenter top ten plays this morning. Props to him and the Boilers. BTW.....Good rebounding game by him.
God I hope so.Did I miss something ? Did two threads that were here around 6 AM today with a bunch of replies by the usual susspects that I was too tired to open just disappear?
God I hope so.
I know there was one posted by Jadeezra that had no business being posted. I'm not sure what else might have been deleted.can you tell me I wasn't just seeing things and you saw them, and brian deleted them?
there were two threads involving treed and top secret and so you're also telling me the guy who started the thread about other posters being negative started a thread that was so inflammatory and baited, that the entire thread and a subsequent one related to it were both deleted ? That makes sense.I know there was one posted by Jadeezra that had no business being posted. I'm not sure what else might have been deleted.
so it was the First Nojel.
Hmmm .,... I could overanalyze that the rest of the day. His left was further out and provided a better angle of reboundThat was his right hand as well.
Hmmm .,... I could overanalyze that the rest of the day. His left was further out and provided a better angle of rebound
The generally accepted rule of thumb for predicting the angle of rebound goes something like this: “The angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.” This is a concept borrowed from classical physics. Although this approach is very accurate when applied to light waves or other forms of electromagnetic radiation (with little or no mass), this rule of thumb can be highly influenced by other forces when applied to a real world setting that is filled with rolling and spinning spheres of significant mass.
I much prefer Harlow HickenlooperThis sounds like some profound intellect from another renowned Hoosier, Clem Cadidlehopper (sp)(aka Red Skelton)
Meaning, I believe he is left handed!Hmmm .,... I could overanalyze that the rest of the day. His left was further out and provided a better angle of rebound
The generally accepted rule of thumb for predicting the angle of rebound goes something like this: “The angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.” This is a concept borrowed from classical physics. Although this approach is very accurate when applied to light waves or other forms of electromagnetic radiation (with little or no mass), this rule of thumb can be highly influenced by other forces when applied to a real world setting that is filled with rolling and spinning spheres of significant mass.
Isn't that what I said?Meaning, I believe he is left handed!
I thought so too... actually, it seems someone said he's ambidextrous or anomalous dominant.Maybe?
They needed deleted.can you tell me I wasn't just seeing things and you saw them, and brian deleted them?
Ok thanks! I don't need to know the contentsThey needed deleted.
Both of Vinny's slams were pretty damn good too. No?
Almost a tech on that first dunk LOL!I'd say so, Pit.
Almost a tech on that first dunk LOL!
Isn't that my man Jacquil rising up and cheering by the scoreboard in the second dunk? JT has a heart of gold.
Heck....gotta throw Carsen Edwards' coast-to-coast "Boogie" in there as well.
The way the Rutgers were bumping into eachother and missing CE........reminds me of Benny Hill LOL
But then again, I'm a bit demented
i only replied to the ridiculous jadeezra thread. glad the thread was deleted.there were two threads involving treed and top secret and so you're also telling me the guy who started the thread about other posters being negative started a thread that was so inflammatory and baited, that the entire thread and a subsequent one related to it were both deleted ? That makes sense.
At least I now know my vision wasn't playing tricks with me. the threads did exist. Without opening them, I have a very good idea of what their content was by the subject title that I saw.
but he was the guy complaining about everybody being negative! and he was 10 times worse than us .i only replied to the ridiculous jadeezra thread. glad the thread was deleted.
Classic, Pit...I'm reminded of that zany chase music every time I consider the competence of Big Ten officiating.
Also, fun trivia for BH fans.....he appeared in the Children's Classic, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang in a supporting role as the Toymaker.
I replied a bunch. It was total BS. At least I know how to shut down a thread now.i only replied to the ridiculous jadeezra thread. glad the thread was deleted.
but he was the guy complaining about everybody being negative! and he was 10 times worse than us .
Chin-up Special.....surprised actually that Bo passed up a golden chance...lol. From everything I've seen and heard, JT is a fantastic teammate....hoping he continues to persevere and overcomes to be a major force with the Boilers.
I am not sure how many saw what was going on but to me it would be the same thing as hekeling a parent at a game. I happened to see ithe thread come up and got upset. I would have done the same thing in a face to face setting as well. But you know this is the enterwebs and everybody can act toughWouldn’t surprise me if that post blacklisted his ID. It was extremely uncalled for. People need to maintain a modicum of decency.
speaking of Bo Bo,
was his offensive foul call on haas the right call? (elblow/hook while posting and turning)
i guess i've just never thought about the hook/chicken wing being called,
while both hands are on the ball to go up for the basket
Sadly, it was a foul on Haas. I wish it was legal for his sake but when you are as big as he is everything is amplified. 6 foot 10 and 230 probably does not get the callProbably, BB. I saw a quick replay.....and I do recall Bardo commenting about it at the time and how that could really smart for him if he took that kind of shot in the shoulder blade.....I'd need to look at it again, but I'm guessing Isaac Haas didn't need to do that to execute the move.....teaching moment for Coach Painter.
Pretty tired of Haas getting penalized for being big. Time for them to let the big guys be big and do what they do. Cough CoUgh Shaquille O’NealSadly, it was a foul on Haas. I wish it was legal for his sake but when you are as big as he is everything is amplified. 6 foot 10 and 230 probably does not get the call