Know how I know you haven't read any of the report? Jesus people, if you've taken the time to actually see any of the report, it's terrible for Trump and his associates.
Ah yes....the Dem's still looking for that little Russian fella, and that female Russian ol' Trump had sex with.
Love the cavalier approach to a clear foreign attack on the American electoral process. As the saying goes "Just keep on keepin' on."
LOL as if that's what this will be about...3 years later and still can't accept the results.
Actually, I fully accept what the report finds the facts to have been.
I suspect that in your heart of hearts that you have a real feel for why Atty. Gen. Barr has been making the attempts at limiting or preventing the Mueller group from open and frank testimony. I know that you will reply that the reason is because it's all out there already and so forth, but I think that you still know really why.
I don't even know wtf he's talking about. A warrant on Trump? Some serious Qanon stuff there.
" Made up Dossier" ?? The FBI " accepted as fact " the conclusion that the information contained therein was worthy of further investigation, NOT " as fact". Nice try.
So, there's behind the scenes stuff that, up until NOW, has " never (come) out ". Wow. There's the Dept. of Justice. There's the Inspector General's Office. There's various Senate committees capable of conducting investigations. But the GOP decided to wait until the Mueller appearance to introduce their " loaded for bear " expose ??!!!! Damn !! Looks like the Dems'll be out back by the woodshed now !!!
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/07/william-barr-robert-mueller-testimony
This is why Mueller needs to testify. Hopefully it will reach the uninformed.
Fact-checking 101: Just another post that confirms to all that you're a walking encyclopedia of misinformation.
Sometimes ya' just have to laugh. The linked story was, in fact, printed in the Chicago Tribune. The CITY of Chicago is not dominated by republicans. Which means WHAT exactly, given the fact this syndicated piece came from the op-ed section of The Washington Post , and was written by the ever-popular MARC THIESSEN - a right wing journalist who has always had a hard-on for the Clintons the size of the Washington Monument. One of these days, BoilerJS, you MIGHT just figure out the difference between straight reporting and opinion journalism. MIGHT.
Ummm... just an fyi, the author of the op-ed was a Bush speechwriter.
Help us out , here, TSB : If (some people) " can't accept the results" of the "16 election, what are the tangible consequences of this ?? Are there multiple recounts still in progress ? Are multiple litigants involved in ongoing suits to have the result overturned ?? Other than observing, on a weekly basis, the evidence that the election winner should be institutionalized, what seems to be our big problem, here ??
He’s heard Hannity say it 50 times a day and liked how it sounded.
Hannity and the entire right-wing Wrecking Crew are probably heard with this goofball line 500 times a day.
it's not a big problem. It's the insane hypocrisy of the left on full display. That you are blind to it and its comedy is no surprise to me though...carry on.
It's very easy to tell you haven't spent one second of time reading the actual report.
Good lord. BoilerJS, were the dozens of charges brought as a result of the investigatory function of the Mueller team classified as " journalism " or as federal indictments ?? indy35 is right: you never read one word of the Justice Dept.'s findings and summaries.
It MUST still be a problem. The question of whether or not the left "accepts" the election results is measured how, exactly ?? By the mere existence of criticism in the way Trump acts as President ?? WHAT THE HELL is your connection to the words " insane hypocrisy" to that fact of US political life ?? What forms does that " hypocrisy " take ?? Huh ?
Another LWNJ fake news investigation ends with a fart and a whimper.
Helps when you have an AG willing to be a puppet and will completely excuse law breaking from his side.
Unfortunately for Michael "the fixer" Cohen and Donald Trump, the entire charming episode of the Donald, Stormy Daniels and the 6-figure hush money payoff became part of the public record. We heard Melania was thrilled, as well. The "fart & a whimper " simply meant that there would be no campaign finance charges brought. BFD . Just exactly what comprised the " fake news" characterization of all of this ? It happened. Everybody knows the story wasn't fake.
The fake news that he did something illegal. That he'll be charged. That he'll be locked up. He won't survive his term. He'll be impeached...blah blah blah you all look like loons more and more, every minute of every day. Whipped up into a frenzy by a dishonest media. You can't even recognize how you are played.
You can't even recognize that your pre-frontal cortex function is roughly equivalent to that of a cocker spaniel. There was scant reporting that he WOULD be charged. Just might. None that he would be "locked up" ;most everybody has accepted the conclusion from a previous Justice Dept. memo that you can't CHARGE, let alone imprison a sitting president !! Impeachment/surviving the term was described in the realm of POSSIBILITY, not as an inevitable outcome. " Loons" you say ?? The loon-in-chief is having his mid-afternoon snack, right about now, at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
