Find where this is written, not just right wing fabrications.
It's a troll bot account or this thing has some serious issues. Either way, everything it posts is meant to try and enflame its perceived enemies. One of those enemies is punctuation, but I digress ...Why is it all about left/right? There are a lot of people that pick sides and spew vitriol back and forth, and the reality is it's all a waste of time because no one changes their mind when going in with that mindset. You're clearly fishing for a reaction with your posts, and you appear to do it rather frequently based on your post history. Why?
Yeah, anything being claimed by Boebert immediately qualifies as an alternative fact.
Why is it all about left/right? There are a lot of people that pick sides and spew vitriol back and forth, and the reality is it's all a waste of time because no one changes their mind when going in with that mindset. You're clearly fishing for a reaction with your posts, and you appear to do it rather frequently based on your post history. Why?
I am 100% for the clucking hens on here who thought this was true because thinking is hard to scarf down as much red meat as they possibly can. Clog those arteries, folks!
not anymoreThere's literally no such thing as a left wing fascist.
Fascism is an intrinsically far-right ideology.
how kind and compassionate to wish pain and death on the oppositionI am 100% for the clucking hens on here who thought this was true because thinking is hard to scarf down as much red meat as they possibly can. Clog those arteries, folks!
You’ve proven that you can’t fix stupid.how kind and compassionate to wish pain and death on the opposition
programmed democrat
youre as programmed and dumb as they come and none of us wish death on youYou’ve proven that you can’t fix stupid.
Eat up!
Fascism can only be rightwing. It by definition a reactionary ideology. I implore you to read a book.not anymore
youre as programmed and dumb as they come and none of us wish death on you
tucker carlson tucker carlson fox news fox
You obviously haven’t heard of Corey Booker. Another whack job. Yes, this is your party.Find where this is written, not just right wing fabrications.
Corey Booker is trying to ban meat? I'm assuming your link to a reputable source is on its way?You obviously haven’t heard of Corey Booker. Another whack job. Yes, this is your party.
You sure about that?There's literally no such thing as a left wing fascist.
Fascism is an intrinsically far-right ideology.
Umm, no...Fascism can only be rightwing. It by definition a reactionary ideology. I implore you to read a book.
I mean, the first sentence on Wikipedia's fascism page says, "... far-right."Umm, no...
do you think youre really good at thisYou “started” this thread with a story by Fox News. I didn’t even mention Fox. You did. You’re really bad at this. Hopefully you’re better at your job at GE although I doubt it since you make 37263 posts a day on here.
It might be time to change your username again. Start fresh. Clean Slate. All that stuff.do you think youre really good at this
37263
let the hysterics begin
listening to a neutered white democrat like you is something that will never happenIt might be time to change your username again. Start fresh. Clean Slate. All that stuff.
Soon enough after you change it again you'll look like an idiot again and we'll all know it's just the kid from Louisville who somehow doesn't understand what a meme is or how to use the internet/message board.
And the cycle starts all over again.
Let me know if you need any tips on using the internet. I'll help a fellow boiler out. "lol"listening to a neutered white democrat like you is something that will never happen
thx
let me know if you need any tips on being a man and not a pussyLet me know if you need any tips on using the internet. I'll help a fellow boiler out. "lol"
I'm very sure. If you don't think that fascism is a rightwing ideology by definition, then you don't understand what fascism is and are confusing it with something else.You sure about that?
There has been considerable disagreement among historians and political scientists about the nature of fascism. Some scholars, for example, regard it as a socially radical movement with ideological ties to the Jacobins of the French Revolution, whereas others see it as an extreme form of conservatism inspired by a 19th-century backlash against the ideals of the Enlightenment. Some find fascism deeply irrational, whereas others are impressed with the rationality with which it served the material interests of its supporters. Similarly, some attempt to explain fascist demonologies as the expression of irrationally misdirected anger and frustration, whereas others emphasize the rational ways in which these demonologies were used to perpetuate professional or class advantages. Finally, whereas some consider fascism to be motivated primarily by its aspirations—by a desire for cultural “regeneration” and the creation of a “new man”—others place greater weight on fascism’s “anxieties”—on its fear of communist revolution and even of left-centrist electoral victories.
HAHAHAHA!!! Yeah because Wikipedia is a bastion of truth. JFC man...I mean, the first sentence on Wikipedia's fascism page says, "... far-right."
@TeddyValentineDidNothingWrongFrom Encyclopedia Brittanica on Fascism... read this and decide for yourselves, because there's a lot of disagreement about what Fascism really is, but this is kinda clear and frankly a little bit scary in the shadow of Trumpism and right-wing propoganda of today (specifically "fear of communist revolution and even of left-centrist electoral victories.") Essentially, according to some, fascism starts when people fear any liberalism and mislabel it as "Communism". Our roots with this kind of thing are deep, dating back to WWII and probably earlier. Some Americans are still politically stuck in the late-1940s.
thats dgboiler for youHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah because Wikipedia is a bastion of truth. JFC man...
thats dgboiler for you
wikipedia
ha ha ha
Seriously, you're the guy using YouTube videos as your source.@TeddyValentineDidNothingWrong
First of all, when people that fled places like Venezuela and Cuba come out and fear what is going on in the Left I think it's important to listen to what they are saying. They've lived it. Doesn't mean they are right, but I'd rather be cautious and protective than cavalier and let it (communism) just happen.
Second, both of you are using modern altered definitions of Fascism. How about you use the definition that existed during the time of Fascism...
![]()
Definition of FASCISM
a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
Read that and tell me that this doesn't sound more like today's Left and not the Right.
LOL, yes modern books skewing history. Once again, this is part of the ORIGINAL definition of Fascism because this existed during the time of Fascism.Seriously, you're the guy using YouTube videos as your source.
The Wikipedia article actually has sources listed. Two different books are sourced. Totally ridiculous that you mock Wikipedia, yet it frequently has legitimate sources cited.
I use YouTube because there is a LOT to learn about the world that you can't learn anywhere else. The media has a narrative and they only push stories that push that narrative (I know this to be true also because I know writers on the inside of CNN). I watch a lot of stuff and I have learned how to pick out what's most likely BS and what isn't. Most sources I use show first hand accounts (video, data, studies, etc). You can blow them off if you chose but you're choosing to be stuck within the narrative which CNN higher ups have admitted is mostly propaganda.Seriously, you're the guy using YouTube videos as your source.
The Wikipedia article actually has sources listed. Two different books are sourced. Totally ridiculous that you mock Wikipedia, yet it frequently has legitimate sources cited.
Hey, bud, one of the sources is from 1965. Anyway, your premise is supremely flawed. The argument that YouTube and Twitter are arbiters of free speech is laughable. They're private companies, not the federal government. The constitution doesn't apply. They can ban anyone they want to. If you don't like it, go somewhere else.LOL, yes modern books skewing history. Once again, this is part of the ORIGINAL definition of Fascism because this existed during the time of Fascism.
"Fascism refers to a way of organizing society with an emphasis of autocratic government, dictatorial leadership, and the suppression of opposition. The word entered English as a result of Mussolini's 'fascisti' in Italy, but 'fascisti' and 'fascio,' both referring to a bundle, were used to represent labor and agrarian unions in Italy since at least 1872. "
The Left is much closer to an autocratic government and dictatorial leadership (hard shut downs, wants to restrict what you can eat, wants to force Green New Deal etc) and suppression of opposition (Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google, etc). Tell me the last time the people that were suppressing other people's voices were the good guys.
Restrict what you can eat? Are you going to just keep repeating a lie?LOL, yes modern books skewing history. Once again, this is part of the ORIGINAL definition of Fascism because this existed during the time of Fascism.
"Fascism refers to a way of organizing society with an emphasis of autocratic government, dictatorial leadership, and the suppression of opposition. The word entered English as a result of Mussolini's 'fascisti' in Italy, but 'fascisti' and 'fascio,' both referring to a bundle, were used to represent labor and agrarian unions in Italy since at least 1872. "
The Left is much closer to an autocratic government and dictatorial leadership (hard shut downs, wants to restrict what you can eat, wants to force Green New Deal etc) and suppression of opposition (Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google, etc). Not to mention labor unions... Tell me the last time the people that were suppressing other people's voices were the good guys.
YouTube and Twitter are banning people based on lies and they are currently getting sued over it. Again, tell me when the good guys were ever the ones suppressing voices...Hey, bud, one of the sources is from 1965. Anyway, your premise is supremely flawed. The argument that YouTube and Twitter are arbiters of free speech is laughable. They're private companies, not the federal government. The constitution doesn't apply. They can ban anyone they want to. If you don't like it, go somewhere else.
And you're still clinging to the restrictions on what we eat myth? That was debunked multiple times in another thread. Lol, "dictatorial leadership." You are wayyyy off the deep end.
Again, I was talking about things the left SAY they want to do. They've talked about restricting beef for years because of cow farts, etc.Restrict what you can eat? Are you going to just keep repeating a lie?
Refusing to accept the results of an free and fair election......is literally what fascists do. Firing people who are investigating you, asking foreign governments to investigate your political rivals, demanding loyalty to one man above all else and vendettas against those who aren't. That's fascism. Those things actually happened.
When the voices being suppressed are spreading misinformation packaged as news and hate speech, I don't see the bad in it.YouTube and Twitter are banning people based on lies and they are currently getting sued over it. Again, tell me when the good guys were ever the ones suppressing voices...
When I talk about suppressing what we eat, I wasn't talking about current legislation. The Left has talked about this for years. That was my point. I can see how I seem off the deep end when you're stooped in propaganda.