ADVERTISEMENT

Larry Elder Running for President

So which one of you conservatives are going vote for this clown?
"is going to vote," fauxgrad.

I might vote for him depending on his platform. The fact that you of all people call him a clown speaks well for him.
 
So which one of you conservatives are going vote for this clown?

Big picture.....all in the plan. The D playbook calls for money to flow from D power brokers to enough R candidates to keep Trump in lead with his 30%. This is just one of the field needed for that plan. More candidates will emerge.
 
Big picture.....all in the plan. The D playbook calls for money to flow from D power brokers to enough R candidates to keep Trump in lead with his 30%. This is just one of the field needed for that plan. More candidates will emerge.
Therein lies the problem. You right wingers fall for every jacked up conspiracy theory known.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
*is going to vote

Lol can’t even post in proper English. There’s a surprise…
You misunderstood. BNI is a Region Democrat. "Are" would be proper usage since said group votes multiple times when supporting a candidate.
 
Lots of candidates enter races now that Stacey and Beto have shown that even a failed candidacy can make one a millionaire.
 
Lol says the guy that continues to believe false narratives even after quotes and statistics are provided to prove them unequivocally false. Please, tell us more about right wingers falling for false things 😂
You can start with the 2020 election was stolen foolishness. Plus the Dominion election machine foolishness. The Quanon foolishness. On and on.
 
You can start with the 2020 election was stolen foolishness. Plus the Dominion election machine foolishness. The Quanon foolishness. On and on.
Want me to share some things about what Democrats said about the 2016 election being stolen? Or Democrats doubts regarding the Dominion election machines? I don’t know what “Quanon” is.

After sharing the above, we can go over the false narratives you believe that have been proven to be false by statistics and reality. Where do you want me to start? And I like how you don’t acknowledge being proven wrong. You just put your head down and head to the next discussion. Like a typical Democrat, you can’t acknowledge any truths that get in the way of a Democrat narrative. On and on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Therein lies the problem. You right wingers fall for every jacked up conspiracy theory known.

You want to call something that has happened historically, like flooding the field with candidates a conspiracy? LOL.

Flooding the field with candidates is nothing new. Not a conspiracy. Has happened in many state & national elections off & on over time in both D & R elections. And often has various funding sources from BOTH parties behind the efforts, and cross over funding from parties also has been used before. One of the many strategies to winning power......used over & over in history.
 
You want to call something that has happened historically, like flooding the field with candidates a conspiracy? LOL.

Flooding the field with candidates is nothing new. Not a conspiracy. Has happened in many state & national elections off & on over time in both D & R elections. And often has various funding sources from BOTH parties behind the efforts, and cross over funding from parties also has been used before. One of the many strategies to winning power......used over & over in history.
As a self-described student of history, bni should know that - and much else that he does not know.
 
You want to call something that has happened historically, like flooding the field with candidates a conspiracy? LOL.

Flooding the field with candidates is nothing new. Not a conspiracy. Has happened in many state & national elections off & on over time in both D & R elections. And often has various funding sources from BOTH parties behind the efforts, and cross over funding from parties also has been used before. One of the many strategies to winning power......used over & over in history.
And I think we’ve gotten to the point where anything, and I mean anything at all that has to do with Republicans is labeled a “conspiracy theory.” Like the race card, they’ve devalued the conspiracy theory.
 
You want to call something that has happened historically, like flooding the field with candidates a conspiracy? LOL.

Flooding the field with candidates is nothing new. Not a conspiracy. Has happened in many state & national elections off & on over time in both D & R elections. And often has various funding sources from BOTH parties behind the efforts, and cross over funding from parties also has been used before. One of the many strategies to winning power......used over & over in history.
Hold on. You’re saying what happened in ‘22 with dem donors supporting MAGA candidates in the House has happened over and over in our history? And in presidential elections? You should link that.

You’re also trying to tie that in with “flooding the field”. Dems are supporting Republican presidential candidates to increase the field so that trump wins? You should definitely link that.

In the ‘22 congressional elections dems were supporting one Republican candidate. No flooding. But now you’re not only saying it happens in presidential elections but dems are doing it with multiple candidates. But the purpose isn’t to get them to lose to dems, it’s to hurt trump. Yeah, that is a conspiracy theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
Hold on. You’re saying what happened in ‘22 with dem donors supporting MAGA candidates in the House has happened over and over in our history? And in presidential elections? You should link that.

You’re also trying to tie that in with “flooding the field”. Dems are supporting Republican presidential candidates to increase the field so that trump wins? You should definitely link that.

In the ‘22 congressional elections dems were supporting one Republican candidate. No flooding. But now you’re not only saying it happens in presidential elections but dems are doing it with multiple candidates. But the purpose isn’t to get them to lose to dems, it’s to hurt trump. Yeah, that is a conspiracy theory.
By having more candidates in the field, the votes get spread out more, thus giving Trump a better chance to win the nomination. It's not rocket science. The Dems did the same thing to Bernie. Candidates stayed in that had no chance to win simply to take votes from him and give Hillary and then Biden the nomination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
By having more candidates in the field, the votes get spread out more, thus giving Trump a better chance to win the nomination. It's not rocket science. The Dems did the same thing to Bernie. Candidates stayed in that had no chance to win simply to take votes from him and give Hillary and then Biden the nomination.
I understand what a bigger field does for trump…….at least what it did in the last election. That’s not what I’m questioning.
 
Hold on. You’re saying what happened in ‘22 with dem donors supporting MAGA candidates in the House has happened over and over in our history? And in presidential elections? You should link that.

You’re also trying to tie that in with “flooding the field”. Dems are supporting Republican presidential candidates to increase the field so that trump wins? You should definitely link that.

In the ‘22 congressional elections dems were supporting one Republican candidate. No flooding. But now you’re not only saying it happens in presidential elections but dems are doing it with multiple candidates. But the purpose isn’t to get them to lose to dems, it’s to hurt trump. Yeah, that is a conspiracy theory.
I’m telling y’all, these right wingers can come up with some whoppers. All you have to do is listen the right wing SiriusXM station, “The Patriot” channel for at least couple of hours and you will hear all the conspiracy theories you can ever want to hear.
 
I’m telling y’all, these right wingers can come up with some whoppers. All you have to do is listen the right wing SiriusXM station, “The Patriot” channel for at least couple of hours and you will hear all the conspiracy theories you can ever want to hear.
Their whoppers pale in comparison to your whoppers (what kind of nut job claims that 90% of Republicans are whites supremacists?). Nice disappearing act when you were challenged again. Respond to him who you know won’t challenge you. Like a good little indoctrinated, cult left winger.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Boilermaker03
I’m telling y’all, these right wingers can come up with some whoppers. All you have to do is listen the right wing SiriusXM station, “The Patriot” channel for at least couple of hours and you will hear all the conspiracy theories you can ever want to hear.
My understanding was the public democratic financial support of the MAGA candidates last cycle was unheard of. I could be wrong.

But if I understand this, dems are doing the same thing for multiple candidates, all to make sure trump wins the nomination. Quite a leap.
 
My understanding was the public democratic financial support of the MAGA candidates last cycle was unheard of. I could be wrong.

But if I understand this, dems are doing the same thing for multiple candidates, all to make sure trump wins the nomination. Quite a leap.
You ain’t joking’ it’s a leap. These guys are something else.
 
I’m telling y’all, these right wingers can come up with some whoppers. All you have to do is listen the right wing SiriusXM station, “The Patriot” channel for at least couple of hours and you will hear all the conspiracy theories you can ever want to hear.
What is it with you and radio shows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeDubya
You guys won't win any grammar bee contests either. That's for sure.
Who’s “you guys”? And would you rather use proper grammar or not fall for every single false Democrat narrative out there? You can’t do either so you get to pick one.
 
Because radio shows aren't going to be the best for either side. Especially not for a good perspective on things.
Not sure if they are the best or not but these radio hosts set the topics of discussions for that day and callers call in and along with the hosts give their opinions just like this forum. The discussions and opinions that are discussed on the conservative channel are very much in line with the opinions y’all opine on this board. The same with the progressive stations and the progressives on this board.
 
Listen to Dan Abrams and Smerconish on XM POTUS channel. Both sides covered.
I forgot about the POTUS channel. I will definitely give it a shot. Sounds like it will keep my blood pressure down, unlike The Patriot Channel.
 
So Dems spending money to support Republicans doesn't happen, Really?


I thought this was common knowledge. Obviously, not everyone here knows this or is afraid to admit how power hungry the left is.

Rs aren't quite as bad, but with their gerrymandering they aren't too far behind. But add in ballot harvesting and other D tricks, the Rs pale in comparison.

Anything for power though on both sides Party over everything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
So Dems spending money to support Republicans doesn't happen, Really?

I thought this was common knowledge. Obviously, not everyone here knows this or is afraid to admit how power hungry the left is.

Rs aren't quite as bad, but with their gerrymandering they aren't too far behind. But add in ballot harvesting and other D tricks, the Rs pale in comparison.

Anything for power though on both sides Party over everything.
Yeah, the Dems def do this. They think elevating fringe candidates makes them look more electable, but 2016 and a slew of midterm results should tell them that that strategy doesn't work when they can't run on anything themselves. It's how the Dems have lost the vast majority of state legislatures over the past 10 years as well.
 
Elder is doing this to help Trump, he’s not a serious candidate. The more candidates the better for Trump, Elder maybe takes votes away from the serious candidate Tim Scott.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DualGrad
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT