You cannot have it both ways. You claim that "I never said that Smith would be unsuccessful." despite the posts which rather clearly indicate your view otherwise when read in context. Well, if we are to read EXACTLY what is written, then your comment in your cited post 58 must be read the same way. Reading literally both ways in order to be consistent. If so, you, by your own admission, in this thread mocked Smith in the entire referenced post, not just part of it because you look foolish in the whole and only want involvement in a part. Your post did not make the distinction when read literally. So stop pretending otherwise because that is the way you demand that your posts be read. If you cannot write properly that is on you. You have insisted that your words be read literally and not in any context. Your attempt to then weasel out of the literal post, along with the others, and claim that you didn't mean what is written is duplicitous.
If anything, this thread has exposed you for who you are. You have been demonstrated to be dishonest, caviling, arrogant and lacking in reading comprehension. I will leave it to the other here to judge who has attempted to engage in honest discussion and who is the fraud, I am pretty confident about which of us will be viewed as correct by others - and it is not you.