I would be happy to get Schiano. Our current players will probably sh*t their pants. I heard he is a total disciplinarian. No BS at all. Unlike DH that was their "buddy". That's why Schiano was not a good fit for the NFL. The players didn't like his discipline. He made Rutgers relevant. No-one before or after him has been able to do that. Obviously, he knows how to turn a turd into a team.
I actually think what got Hazell in to problems is that he took too much of a CEO/NFL type approach to overseeing the program. He self-admitted that he made a mistake of not meeting with the players personally when he was hired and failed to spend time to get to know them on a personal level. Want to figure out why that first year was a total disaster....there you go.
Schiano is my first choice because (1) I think he could turn things around at Purdue and (2) I think he'd stick around. We know he's not looking to the NFL and WL is s good place to raise a family, good schools, low crime, etc.
With Fleck or Rhule or Herman, they're younger and may be more inclined to use Purdue as a stepping stone.
At this point if a coach were to rebuild Purdue enough to be sought after from the big boys, than he'd obviously have them back in contention. Which is fine by me.
Yes, please use us like that!
You guys are looking at the wrong "either or".
Would you prefer a coach who comes here, wins and stays or one who comes here, wins and leaves?
And with a head stone that says Here lies the best of Morgan BurkIf he wins he can take a dump on the 50 yd line on his way out for all I care.