Yeah, Rutgers under Pikiell reminds me of those Dick Bennett Wisconsin teams from the late 90s. They were tough, hard-nosed, defensive teams that had limited fire power but could muck up more talented opponents. Purdue had problems with those teams, too.Other than because they’re good at beating Purdue, no reason. Well-coached, unselfish players who make it difficult on opponents. I respect their program a lot.
Yeah, Rutgers under Pikiell reminds me of those Dick Bennett Wisconsin teams from the late 90s. They were tough, hard-nosed, defensive teams that had limited fire power but could muck up more talented opponents. Purdue had problems with those teams, too.
Next year will be terrifying if we play there. Fortunately, those two recruits are only there for next year.They have been giving much better Purdue teams all they can handle. But now, they are starting to get highly rated recruits, which should make them tougher to beat. And, the whole east coast fan base is irritating.
And probably more importantly, without Zach.Next year will be terrifying if we play there. Fortunately, those two recruits are only there for next year.
They are one of several teams that set the B1G back and make for ugly basketball. Foul as often as possible and dare the refs to call them all. I personally hate that style of basketball and wish there was less of it in our conference.
Yes, 20 years ago it was a different game. Unfortunately someone forgot to tell the B1G it isn't still the 90's.Purdue won a lot of games that way under Keady.
But in today's higher scoring basketball it is hard to watch.
Yeah, but great recruits doesn't necessarily translate into instant success. Ask Indiana.Next year will be terrifying if we play there. Fortunately, those two recruits are only there for next year.
Keady's teams were hard nosed, yes, but Rutgers plays a more rough, aggressive form of bball that has no historical counterpart with any Purdue team I've ever seen.Yes, hard nosed defensive much like the Gene Keady teams.
But see the dislike of them beating Purdue and for sure in NJ.
But it's Joisey vs Indianatheir program does not have a winning history but still get more athletic player than Purdue does.
They killed my grandfather.The main reason I can't stand Rutgers basketball is...
it's ugly basketball.The main reason I can't stand Rutgers basketball is...
one thing I like about him as a coach, if one style of D isn't working try another or as he did today switching different types of DI would take Pikiell as a coach all day long.
….that they cheat by playing a wizard to boost their scoring. This isn’t quidditch after all.The main reason I can't stand Rutgers basketball is...
yeah it's ugly and physical but our players know that, how about embracing playing against that style. Today TKR, Furst, and Gillis had 3 freakin rebounds combined and they out rebounded us by 15, that's extra possessions.it's ugly basketball.
But it's what they can do to win games. Hard-nosed, defensive, in your face. If they had more playmakers they could be good. Think Houston without the offensive firepower.
Rutgers took 19 more shots than us. NINETEEN! Some of that is turnovers and the fact that we got to the line a lot, but still.yeah it's ugly and physical but our players know that, how about embracing playing against that style. Today TKR, Furst, and Gillis had 3 freakin rebounds combined and they out rebounded us by 15, that's extra possessions.
Wow that’s crazy and we got out rebounded for first time all year, I believe?Rutgers took 19 more shots than us. NINETEEN! Some of that is turnovers and the fact that we got to the line a lot, but still.
F) because we already have ugly, drag you through the mud "basketball" with %$#@$&*$ wisc.I'll give a few of my own. Can't just choose one, ya know!
A) because Piscataway, NJ is where refs go to lose their minds.
B) because...wait, that was basketball?
C) because of the cracked-out, jackass fans.
D) Steve Pikiell's face.
E) because Jersey Mike's Arena is Satan's favorite vacation residence, and I don't like Satan.
While it was frustrating and a good talking point for Painter to use to motivate, I do think some of the rebounding issues were caused by uncalled shoves and over the back and also because some of those Rutgers bricks came off the rim so hard that it was a detriment to be in good rebounding position. 😂yeah it's ugly and physical but our players know that, how about embracing playing against that style. Today TKR, Furst, and Gillis had 3 freakin rebounds combined and they out rebounded us by 15, that's extra possessions.
so it's the first time we got out rebounded this year, so after 21 games we never ran into the issue pointed out?While it was frustrating and a good talking point for Painter to use to motivate, I do think some of the rebounding issues were caused by uncalled shoves and over the back and also because some of those Rutgers bricks came off the rim so hard that it was a detriment to be in good rebounding position. 😂
I mean, yeah, it could be. There’s a first time for everything. The bigger point was that this was an outlier. First of all, Furst only played 2 minutes so him not racking up boards isn’t really surprising. So that leaves 3 of the 32 team rebounds to TKR(2) and Gillis (1). Well, who are they on the floor with most of the time? Zach who had 12, Jones with 10 and Smith with 6. The fact that the shortest guy on the court and another guard had half the team’s rebounds could be an indicator that a lot of rebounds weren’t in the post. Again, not sure it’s anything that fans need to be getting their panties in a bunch over. If it starts happening consistently, then there’s a problem. My guess is we’ll out rebound Northwestern handily on Wednesday.so it's the first time we got out rebounded this year, so after 21 games we never ran into the issue pointed out?
I don't have a concern about the rebounding based upon this game. I'm also unsure how many rebounds happened outside of a few feet of the rim, but it wasn't something I focused on (location). I just thought there was a lot of shoving inside and they had some guards a bit taller than Purdue crashing the boards as well. If you are playing Purdue you are aware of their rebounding and that is and will be the rest of the year an emphasis for the opposition. Matt has always wanted his guards to rebound.I mean, yeah, it could be. There’s a first time for everything. The bigger point was that this was an outlier. First of all, Furst only played 2 minutes so him not racking up boards isn’t really surprising. So that leaves 3 of the 32 team rebounds to TKR(2) and Gillis (1). Well, who are they on the floor with most of the time? Zach who had 12, Jones with 10 and Smith with 6. The fact that the shortest guy on the court and another guard had half the team’s rebounds could be an indicator that a lot of rebounds weren’t in the post. Again, not sure it’s anything that fans need to be getting their panties in a bunch over. If it starts happening consistently, then there’s a problem. My guess is we’ll out rebound Northwestern handily on Wednesday.
It's the East Coast playground players. We'll never want their attitudes... it is what it is. We're in the top ranking more than any other team using mostly Indiana players.their program does not have a winning history but still get more athletic player than Purdue does.
WOW --- so no more Indiana Mr. Basketballs?I would take Pikiell as a coach all day long.
that is true. But there is more to basketball than rebounding, although I always coached to rebound ... but one must be able to score after a rebound... or one loses.yeah it's ugly and physical but our players know that, how about embracing playing against that style. Today TKR, Furst, and Gillis had 3 freakin rebounds combined and they out rebounded us by 15, that's extra possessions.
I watched again and lost count, but the first 3 rebounds each for Braden and Lance were deep in the lane. Early Rutgers seemed to only send one rebounder on perimeter shots. Guessing they were concerned about setting their D based upon not shooting well and not wanting Purdue to get out in transition. Later that changed as they started sending more to the boards. I watched the 10 second call twice (12+minutes left in game). The first count I had was 7 and the next was 8. I was trying hard not to go too slow and so it seemed like another bad call. I watched a few times Ethan's foul on the 3 ball. In the spirit of the rules I understand how it could be called. Hiatt kicked his legs out to sell it and Ethan did touch his left shoulder on the way up and so even though Hiatt was wanting a foul, Ethan gave him the opportunity to bail him out. That said, Fletcher may have got the benefit of a foul on his 3 ball as well.I mean, yeah, it could be. There’s a first time for everything. The bigger point was that this was an outlier. First of all, Furst only played 2 minutes so him not racking up boards isn’t really surprising. So that leaves 3 of the 32 team rebounds to TKR(2) and Gillis (1). Well, who are they on the floor with most of the time? Zach who had 12, Jones with 10 and Smith with 6. The fact that the shortest guy on the court and another guard had half the team’s rebounds could be an indicator that a lot of rebounds weren’t in the post. Again, not sure it’s anything that fans need to be getting their panties in a bunch over. If it starts happening consistently, then there’s a problem. My guess is we’ll out rebound Northwestern handily on Wednesday.