Hero with a gun was expressing his CONSTITUIONAL rights

[Chris P Bacon]

Man Who Killed Indiana Mass Shooter Armed Under 'Constitutional Carry'

The 22-year-old man who shot and killed the would-be mass shooter at Greenwood Park Mall was armed because of "constitutional carry."

www.breitbart.com

Just a short time in and the change is already saving lives.

 

[BSIT]

Man Who Killed Indiana Mass Shooter Armed Under 'Constitutional Carry'

The 22-year-old man who shot and killed the would-be mass shooter at Greenwood Park Mall was armed because of "constitutional carry."

www.breitbart.com

Just a short time in and the change is already saving lives.

It didn't happen because you linked Breibart. Tic

 

[Chris P Bacon]

It didn't happen because you linked Breibart. Tic

Yeah what was I thinking. /s

 

[BoilerBiker]

if the good samaritan had a bigger gun
he might have been able to save even more lives

 

[SKYDOG]

if the good samaritan had a bigger gun
he might have been able to save even more lives

To bad someone like him wasn’t at Highland Park during the parade.

 

[PurdueFan1]

To bad someone like him wasn’t at Highland Park during the parade.

There were a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde and we see how that turned out

 

[clbndgm]

There were a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde and we see how that turned out

I am calling BS here. There was no one at Uvalde like this guy. Sure, there were a lot of armed men standing around checking their phones and wandering the hallways. Maybe checking to see if the cafeteria was open.

But there was no one there who put themself at risk and took the responsibility to do something, at the risk of their own personal safety and reputation if it turned out badly. But then, you knew that as well as I do. It just doesn't support your narrative, does it? I can't say I am completely comfortable with IN's constitutional carry laws (I live in IN). but to say in this instance there were many like him at Uvalde is so patently untrue it makes me wonder what you guys are thinking. Or are you thinking at all?

 

[PurdueFan1]

I am calling BS here. There was no one at Uvalde like this guy. Sure, there were a lot of armed men standing around checking their phones and wandering the hallways. Maybe checking to see if the cafeteria was open.

But there was no one there who put themself at risk and took the responsibility to do something, at the risk of their own personal safety and reputation if it turned out badly. But then, you knew that as well as I do. It just doesn't support your narrative, does it? I can't say I am completely comfortable with IN's constitutional carry laws (I live in IN). but to say in this instance there were many like him at Uvalde is so patently untrue it makes me wonder what you guys are thinking. Or are you thinking at all?

Oh I was 100% talking about the police here. I mean a bunch of paid good guys did nothing.

I wasn’t pushing a narrative, but since you went down that route, here’s what I would say: what kind of fukked up country do we live in that we’re lauding some rando that was carrying a gun at a mall to stop another guy with a gun at a mall. It is beyond messed up that we’re at the point that this is what we applaud. Not that there was another shooting. Not that someone had easy access to a gun, but woo hoo our Wild West everyone gets a gun mentality happened to work in this instance when 99% of the time it doesn’t.

That’s my narrative, since you brought it up.

 

[New Pal Boiler]

Oh I was 100% talking about the police here. I mean a bunch of paid good guys did nothing.

You said there was a “a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde”. Wrong. Again.

But you are used to that.

 

[BSIT]

There were a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde and we see how that turned out

The only difference was he immediately went after the shooter even though he was by himself without body armor

 

[PurdueFan1]

You said there was a “a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde”. Wrong. Again.

But you are used to that.

Aren’t the police good guys?

 

[BSIT]

Aren’t the police good guys?

That was an embarrassment just like the Parkland school shooting. If cops are afraid, they are in the wrong business

 

[New Pal Boiler]

Aren’t the police good guys?

Only if they have a sack.

 

[Chris P Bacon]

There were a bunch of him at the school in Uvalde and we see how that turned out

See the good guy in Indy displayed mountains of courage and bravery where the police at Uvalde didn't it appears the more we learn.

Since you align yourself more with cowardice and fear, I understand your confusion.

 

[PurdueFan1]

See the good guy in Indy displayed mountains of courage and bravery where the police at Uvalde didn't it appears the more we learn.

Since you align yourself more with cowardice and fear, I understand your confusion.

Yeah, that’s it crispy. Keep scraping the bottom of your shoe, bud.

 

[Chris P Bacon]

Yeah, that’s it crispy. Keep scraping the bottom of your shoe, bud.

I did scrape the bottom of my shoe, that's how you came about.

 

[PurdueFan1]

I did scrape the bottom of my shoe, that's how you came about.

Ok I had to chuckle at that one. Props. Lol

 

[tearsforfears]

I did scrape the bottom of my shoe, that's how you came about.

Lol

 

[Indy_Rider]

I am calling BS here. There was no one at Uvalde like this guy. Sure, there were a lot of armed men standing around checking their phones and wandering the hallways. Maybe checking to see if the cafeteria was open.

But there was no one there who put themself at risk and took the responsibility to do something, at the risk of their own personal safety and reputation if it turned out badly. But then, you knew that as well as I do. It just doesn't support your narrative, does it? I can't say I am completely comfortable with IN's constitutional carry laws (I live in IN). but to say in this instance there were many like him at Uvalde is so patently untrue it makes me wonder what you guys are thinking. Or are you thinking at all?

Only disagree with you on one point. You say you are not comfortable with constitutional carry. I'm completely comfortable with it because people with ill intent were not going to follow the law anyways, so all constitutional carry does is make it easier for people with good intent to carry.

 

[Indy_Rider]

And for people who missed

30 yards. Hit on 8 out of 10 shots. Engaged in 15 seconds.

That's impressive, even if he wasn't under pressure.

His grandfather taught him to shoot. Grandpa should be teaching classes for law enforcement apparently.

 

[bonefish1]

And for people who missed

30 yards. Hit on 8 out of 10 shots. Engaged in 15 seconds.

That's impressive, even if he wasn't under pressure.

His grandfather taught him to shoot. Grandpa should be teaching classes for law enforcement apparently.

I think that's outstanding marksmenship.
This guy's body was in a fight or flight response, Bullets were flying from the enemy, people running for their lives and this guy puts 8 out of 10 into the shooter. That's impressive.
Just like Rittenhouse, this guy is a true American hero.

 

[New Pal Boiler]

I think that's outstanding marksmenship.
This guy's body was in a fight or flight response, Bullets were flying from the enemy, people running for their lives and this guy puts 8 out of 10 into the shooter. That's impressive.
Just like Rittenhouse, this guy is a true hero.

Guarantee the shooter wasn’t worried about this guy when he walked into that food court:

 

[Indy_Rider]

Guarantee the shooter wasn’t worried about this guy when he walked into that food court:

Doubt he was dressed like that

And if you are smart, you should always be worried about the country boy. Growing up, I'd walk out back and regularly target shoot for fun. And then there is the entire hunting thing where often, you only get one shot.

For the record, I'm crap with a hand gun. Something I know I need to work on.

 

[SIBoiler2]

Aren’t the police good guys?

There are good police and bad police. The ones in Uvalde may be "good guys" but they all, with one exception, were cowards. The chief should be prosecuted and the remainder should never work in law enforcement again. Unfortunately we don't know when a person becomes a police how they will react under fire. These guys all failed the test and lives were lost.

 

[BSIT]

There are good police and bad police. The ones in Uvalde may be "good guys" but they all, with one exception, were cowards. The chief should be prosecuted and the remainder should never work in law enforcement again. Unfortunately we don't know when a person becomes a police how they will react under fire. These guys all failed the test and lives were lost.

Don’t forget about Parkland too

 

[BSIT]

Guarantee the shooter wasn’t worried about this guy when he walked into that food court:

I was hoping to hear he was a Boiler but have no idea

 

[BoilerBiker]

There are good police and bad police. The ones in Uvalde may be "good guys" but they all, with one exception, were cowards.

1 civilian in IN > 376 government agents in TX

 

[Chris P Bacon]

And on the heels of this, the left has put up a bill to ban "assault rifles". It won't pass by any stretch and will get sued in to the ground (let alone SCOTUS already ruled on it in 2008 I think), but this is just more evidence that they are coming for all the guns.

It's just more political theater since that is all the left can do, but still they aren't even trying to hide it anymore.

Nadler admits it's about gun grabbing: https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/20/jerry-nadler-gun-bill-common-use/