Haven't seen this discussed on the F1 and Technical

[Purdue85]

Not sure where your beef is. The refs did not make the F1 call until they looked at the monitor. Unless... this is about the chili debate.

I think the double T was made before the paly stopped if I recall correctly. Pain was walking at Williams and both were probably saying words that warranted a technical. In my view, Pain was clearly the aggressor in the situation, but Williams provoked the confrontation after seeing the contact.

The OP brought out some interesting points, and I learned something from it.

the beef is with me.

It's all good.

It goes back a ways, and it's some deep-seated anger at a position I held on some topic that didn't go well.

Not sure why it's necessary. I've had some ... "intense"?? ... exchanges with @purduepat1969 and others, yet we recognize our differences, find common ground in other areas, and move on. Same with @Wolegib . I don't agree with a LOT of what he posts, but he will occasionally post something insightful, and I give credit where credit is due.

Life's too short to carry a grudge.

I'd buy a beer for anyone here. Well, as long as @ChoiceBeef isn't eating that crap chili. then he can choke that crap down with Meisterbrau.

 

[PurdueDave]

If that’s the only difference you see between those two plays, then there’s no real discussion to be had here. Maybe the play you saw on Sasha looked a lot worse to you than it actually was. Maybe vice versa is true for me. Either way we can agree to disagree.

There were two views where it looks like nothing. BUt the view from under the basket looks a lot like the Florida hit. Obviously it didn't knock Sasha down, but the intent was as clear as day. So yeah, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

 

[ChoiceBeef]

I'd buy a beer for anyone here. Well, as long as @ChoiceBeef isn't eating that crap chili. then he can choke that crap down with Meisterbrau.

I’ll be at the Illinois game. You can buy me whatever the swill they have on tap.