Enough said really, but this gives painter more of those good difficult decisions. Could Hammons and Haas both be the best two centers in the Big Ten? How do you justify not every playing Hammons at the four when Swanigan is taking a breather? I think that adds an interesting element, and if you don't you under utilize both H&H.
Maybe play some zone when both are in to throw off the opponent. Hammons can play more of a set up guy at the 4, doing picks, and then running in, while Haas is right in the middle gathering attention. Maybe Painter wants to save some of this for tough conference play, but wouldn't it benefit to practice some of this?
I also personally would like to see Hammons have all four years as a block leader in the B1G, and have players want to come back for a fourth year. I just kind of think if Hammons only gets 20 mpg its unfair to him in even if Haas is playing so efficiently. I think Hammons can do more or less what Swanigan does at the four, just differently.
So if you're Matt Painter, what do you do?
Maybe play some zone when both are in to throw off the opponent. Hammons can play more of a set up guy at the 4, doing picks, and then running in, while Haas is right in the middle gathering attention. Maybe Painter wants to save some of this for tough conference play, but wouldn't it benefit to practice some of this?
I also personally would like to see Hammons have all four years as a block leader in the B1G, and have players want to come back for a fourth year. I just kind of think if Hammons only gets 20 mpg its unfair to him in even if Haas is playing so efficiently. I think Hammons can do more or less what Swanigan does at the four, just differently.
So if you're Matt Painter, what do you do?