not quite enough. Rutgers size seemed to be the deciding factor with a lot of rebounds and blocks. Oh well, typical Purdue refrain, "wait until next year", with a really young team and hopefully some "players" coming in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are some issues surrounding the program but you hit the head directly when you say that recruiting is the major issue. That problem ties direct to the coaching staff and that inability to bring talent in ties directly to an inability to compete and a stagnation in the success of the program.At the risk of getting stoned, I do not think coaching is the problem. I do not think Coach V is a bad coach at all and, in fact, has gotten a lot out of her teams, often finishing the season in a strong way. The issue is recruiting and the fact that many of the top Indiana and Midwestern players go elsewhere. You cannot win at a high level without some of them and we do, occasionally, get a top recruit, like the lucky find with MCClaughlin ( and perhaps Harris too), but not enough. Whether Austin or Katie or anyone else can change that is a big guess. Since the scandal hit our program under Curry and we lost those three A-A players, our program has gone down and, concurrently, McGraw at ND, who we were neck and neck with, shot up with players like Diggins and she continues to pound us in recruiting. Can that change? For example, from Danville, Il, is a top guard named Anya Peoples, already committed to ND as a junior. Those are the kinds of wins we have to get in the recruiting wars. That is the issue, I believe, not coaching.
If you have ever met and talked with SV you would realize that she is very dull. Reminds me of Ray Eddy in that she seems to think all she has to do is offer a scholly and players should be grateful and accept it. I think an aggressive approach like the one Brohm has brought in is needed to get some players that can compete. Seems like our best players are coming from GA which I assume is the influence of the asst. coach.There are some issues surrounding the program but you hit the head directly when you say that recruiting is the major issue. That problem ties direct to the coaching staff and that inability to bring talent in ties directly to an inability to compete and a stagnation in the success of the program.
I, too, was on the CSV bandwagon when she first arrived. I was very supportive of the hire. I wanted to see a more upbeat style of play and her IU team with less talent outplayed us while she was there.At the risk of getting stoned, I do not think coaching is the problem. I do not think Coach V is a bad coach at all and, in fact, has gotten a lot out of her teams, often finishing the season in a strong way. The issue is recruiting and the fact that many of the top Indiana and Midwestern players go elsewhere. You cannot win at a high level without some of them and we do, occasionally, get a top recruit, like the lucky find with MCClaughlin ( and perhaps Harris too), but not enough. Whether Austin or Katie or anyone else can change that is a big guess. Since the scandal hit our program under Curry and we lost those three A-A players, our program has gone down and, concurrently, McGraw at ND, who we were neck and neck with, shot up with players like Diggins and she continues to pound us in recruiting. Can that change? For example, from Danville, Il, is a top guard named Anya Peoples, already committed to ND as a junior. Those are the kinds of wins we have to get in the recruiting wars. That is the issue, I believe, not coaching.
I, too, was on the CSV bandwagon when she first arrived. I was very supportive of the hire. I wanted to see a more upbeat style of play and her IU team with less talent outplayed us while she was there.
However, upbeat style quickly turned to sloppy play, high turnovers, inconsistent defense, and a frustrating lack of basketball fundamentals.
Basketball fans in the State of Indiana are knowledgeable about the game. The downward trend in attendance and enthusiasm in WBB has as much to do with the difficulty in watching bad basketball as it does the lack of success in the win/loss column. We may not be getting Top 10 talent, but we do have talent on this and previous teams. UNFORCED turnovers, a lack of player improvement, and rarely having 4 year players are a result of poor leadership.
I was a big fan of Morgan Burke, however he did not like to fire anyone. Maybe we need to go outside the Purdue family to find a great coach that doesn't feel entitled to unlimited forgiveness for poor coaching?
Add to the above the fact the last several times I have been near CSV, she has had a arrogant attitude and semi-rude to me and others when I was standing nearby...including an autograph session earlier this year. Didn't sit well with my kids and grandkids when she made a snide comment to them.
I would rather not mention directly what other coaches have mentioned about CSV and why they believe the program has taken a downward trend and why many players leave or talented players don't come to Purdue. It has nothing to do with her as a coach but more about the culture about and within the program that she is responsible for. Some people would simply rather not go and play for a coach with that culture in the program.If you have ever met and talked with SV you would realize that she is very dull. Reminds me of Ray Eddy in that she seems to think all she has to do is offer a scholly and players should be grateful and accept it. I think an aggressive approach like the one Brohm has brought in is needed to get some players that can compete. Seems like our best players are coming from GA which I assume is the influence of the asst. coach.
Lin Dun had the same "culture" and was very successful. Difference in my mind is that Dun was a real outgoing character at any golf outing, social event, etc. whereas SV is an introvert and very abrupt.I would rather not mention directly what other coaches have mentioned about CSV and why they believe the program has taken a downward trend and why many players leave or talented players don't come to Purdue. It has nothing to do with her as a coach but more about the culture about and within the program that she is responsible for. Some people would simply rather not go and play for a coach with that culture in the program.
And why do we consider this a non-revenue sport? The crowds of old surely generated meaningful revenue. You don't have to cover your costs to generate enough revenue to make it important.
Whatever revenue is generated is insignificant.
WBB was a break even revenue sport in the early 2000's.