Fox Poor at Running Debates

[Boiler Buck]

How they could improve....
1. Cut the mics on these people.
2. Ask short questions.....quit grandstanding with these bloated, lengthy questions. It's about the candidates, not the announcer.
3. Have question penalties for candidates that interrupt. If you interrupt you lose a question they were going to ask you. That stops that immediately.

So far.......Fox looks bad this year. Poor job. Too much bickering and interrupting allowed.

 

[tjreese]

How they could improve....
1. Cut the mics on these people.
2. Ask short questions.....quit grandstanding with these bloated, lengthy questions. It's about the candidates, not the announcer.
3. Have question penalties for candidates that interrupt. If you interrupt you lose a question they were going to ask you. That stops that immediately.

So far.......Fox looks bad this year. Poor job. Too much bickering and interrupting allowed.

Was reading and completely forgot it was on

 

[BNIBoiler]

What else is new. Faux News is poor at everything. You are correct though. They are not controlling these debates what so ever. Can you imagine how these debates would have gone if Chump participated?

 

[Boiler Buck]

What else is new. Faux News is poor at everything. You are correct though. They are not controlling these debates what so ever. Can you imagine how these debates would have gone if Chump participated?

Would have been wild if T was there! Fox clearly afraid to have a plan, implement it & lay down the law.

 

[Riveting-]

What else is new. Faux News is poor at everything. You are correct though. They are not controlling these debates what so ever. Can you imagine how these debates would have gone if Chump participated?

Do you think Fox was poor at the following:

1. Calling the Russian collusion scandal a hoax from the very start.
2. Saying covid started in a wuhan lab despite what Fauci and the DC medical establishment were claiming in their coverup.
3. Saying Hunter's laptop was real despite the lies of Biden, the DC establishment, and the dems before the 2020 election.
4. Saying Biden had a history of lying and incompetence before the 2020 election.

All of these were contrary to what the NBC, CBS, ABC, and the other regime media were telling naive people like you who would suck it all down.

 

[BNIBoiler]

Do you think Fox was poor at the following:

1. Calling the Russian collusion scandal a hoax from the very start.
2. Saying covid started in a wuhan lab despite what Fauci and the DC medical establishment were claiming in their coverup.
3. Saying Hunter's laptop was real despite the lies of Biden, the DC establishment, and the dems before the 2020 election.
4. Saying Biden had a history of lying and incompetence before the 2020 election.

All of these were contrary to what the NBC, CBS, ABC, and the other regime media were telling naive people like you who would suck it all down.

Faux News also said that the Dominion voting machines changed the Chump votes into Biden votes.

 

[Boiler Buck]

Faux News also said that the Dominion voting machines changed the Chump votes into Biden votes.

Well on their opinion shows Fox says a lot of things per your posts here. Those are NOT news, but opinion shows.

Fox News I read or on rare occasion watch, is WAY more accurate than any "news" I read or watch from the liberal perspective ....lib "news" cannot tell the difference between news and opinion.....and thusly get things way wrong in their effort to mislead lemmings....and successful doing so, as per @Riveting above.

 

[Riveting-]

Faux News also said that the Dominion voting machines changed the Chump votes into Biden votes.

Fox did not say that. Once again you are misinformed and confused.

 

[BNIBoiler]

Fox did not say that. Once again you are misinformed and confused.

Dude, what are you talking about? Didn't Tucker Carlson work for Faux News? That was the gist of the Dominion $80M lawsuit that got him fired. In addition, Faux News has had that fool chump lawyer, Sydney Powell on several times spreading those Dominion election lies. Knowingly putting on Powell when you know that the Dominion election machine crap is false is bad. Why can't you see that?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/17/media/dominion-fox-news-allegations/index.html

 

[Boiler Buck]

Dude, what are you talking about? Didn't Tucker Carlson work for Faux News? That was the gist of the Dominion $80M lawsuit that got him fired. In addition, Faux News has had that fool chump lawyer, Sydney Powell on several times spreading those Dominion election lies. Knowingly putting on Powell when you know that the Dominion election machine crap is false is bad. Why can't you see that?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/17/media/dominion-fox-news-allegations/index.html

Fox opinion show. Fox news did not say that.

But since he was on Fox network, Fox decided to settle for his alleged inference you posted here. Can't understand why you watch such shows....esp. Carlson?? Is he still on Fox? Don't think so.

 

[BNIBoiler]

Fox opinion show. Fox news did not say that.

But since he was on Fox network, Fox decided to settle for his alleged inference you posted here. Can't understand why you watch such shows....esp. Carlson?? Is he still on Fox? Don't think so.

Yes, the opinion shows featured that BS. But, Lou Dobbs and Bartriromo aren't opinion shows. They are supposedly finance shows. They had that Powell fool on their shows.

I never watched any more than 10 minutes or so of the Faux News opinion shows, if at all since Chump announced his presidency. Haven't watched at all since around 2020. Their current prime time lineup is beyond ridiculous. I can't believe the high ratings that they get. This is why it surprises me that the conservatives in this forum claim that they don't watch Faux News. Prior to 2009, Faux News had pretty good opinion shows. O'Reilly was good. Hannity had the progressive, Colmes as his sidekick. No fools like Carlson, Watters, Ingraham, Gutfeld. After Obama was elected, that's when Fox News became Faux News, and downhill ever since.

 

[Boiler Buck]

Yes, the opinion shows featured that BS. But, Lou Dobbs and Bartriromo aren't opinion shows. They are supposedly finance shows. They had that Powell fool on their shows.

I never watched any more than 10 minutes or so of the Faux News opinion shows, if at all since Chump announced his presidency. Haven't watched at all since around 2020. Their current prime time lineup is beyond ridiculous. I can't believe the high ratings that they get. This is why it surprises me that the conservatives in this forum claim that they don't watch Faux News. Prior to 2009, Faux News had pretty good opinion shows. O'Reilly was good. Hannity had the progressive, Colmes as his sidekick. No fools like Carlson, Watters, Ingraham, Gutfeld. After Obama was elected, that's when Fox News became Faux News, and downhill ever since.

Haven't watched since O you say......LOL
....stopped watching once they called out your hero the "chosen one". You go nuts when I post the truth about him here. Can't handle the truth. 😂

 

[Riveting-]

Dude, what are you talking about? Didn't Tucker Carlson work for Faux News? That was the gist of the Dominion $80M lawsuit that got him fired. In addition, Faux News has had that fool chump lawyer, Sydney Powell on several times spreading those Dominion election lies. Knowingly putting on Powell when you know that the Dominion election machine crap is false is bad. Why can't you see that?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/17/media/dominion-fox-news-allegations/index.html

Dude, you don't understand the difference between reporting what someone says and saying it yourself. Here is something WAPO reported that dem hack Adam Schiff said after the Mueller report was published. Does that mean WAPO told lies about Trump? No (at least in this case), it means WAPO reported Schiff's lies about Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/undoubtedly-there-is-collusion-trump-antagonist-adam-schiff-doubles-down-after-mueller-finds-no-conspiracy/2019/03/26/e972d9e8-4fdd-11e9-a3f7-78b7525a8d5f_story.html

 

[BNIBoiler]

Dude, you don't understand the difference between reporting what someone says and saying it yourself. Here is something WAPO reported that dem hack Adam Schiff said after the Mueller report was published. Does that mean WAPO told lies about Trump? No (at least in this case), it means WAPO reported Schiff's lies about Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/undoubtedly-there-is-collusion-trump-antagonist-adam-schiff-doubles-down-after-mueller-finds-no-conspiracy/2019/03/26/e972d9e8-4fdd-11e9-a3f7-78b7525a8d5f_story.html

You supposedly do not watch Faux News, which is good if you don't actually, and you are correct that if there is a difference between if you report on it or say it yourself. Because you supposedly don't watch Faux News you would not know the difference between the hard news folks like Bill Hemmer or Brett Baier or the the fools like Carlson, Hannity, Ingraham, Watters, and Gutfeld. The latter are the ones who were big time Chumpers that falsely promoted the election lie crap. Some of them actively discuss, not report, it on their shows. Then off camera, their text or email is the complete opposite. Knowing that the election was stolen was false and knowing that the Dominion election machines changing votes was false, they continue to discuss that this was true. They even had the ring leader in this false narrative, Sydney Green on their shows to discuss this false narrative. This is why Faux News is hot garbage. They've been doing this crap for at least 14 years. They used to be a nice conservative leaning network that went awry.

 

[Riveting-]

You supposedly do not watch Faux News, which is good if you don't actually, and you are correct that if there is a difference between if you report on it or say it yourself. Because you supposedly don't watch Faux News you would not know the difference between the hard news folks like Bill Hemmer or Brett Baier or the the fools like Carlson, Hannity, Ingraham, Watters, and Gutfeld. The latter are the ones who were big time Chumpers that falsely promoted the election lie crap. Some of them actively discuss, not report, it on their shows. Then off camera, their text or email is the complete opposite. Knowing that the election was stolen was false and knowing that the Dominion election machines changing votes was false, they continue to discuss that this was true. They even had the ring leader in this false narrative, Sydney Green on their shows to discuss this false narrative. This is why Faux News is hot garbage. They've been doing this crap for at least 14 years. They used to be a nice conservative leaning network that went awry.

More confusion and incoherence on your part.

I used to watch Carlson, now I watch Ingraham. Point to statements in which either "promoted" the election lie (that is, the one about Dominion, not the dems lie that the laptop was Russian disinfo).

This crook, now in prison for 14 years for lying in court and stealing from his clients, appeared on CNN 121 times. 121 times! Does that mean CNN promoted his lies and frauds?

CNN even floated the idea Avenetti was presidential material.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/michael-avenatti-donald-trump-2020/index.html

 

[BNIBoiler]

More confusion and incoherence on your part.

I used to watch Carlson, now I watch Ingraham. Point to statements in which either "promoted" the election lie (that is, the one about Dominion, not the dems lie that the laptop was Russian disinfo).

This crook, now in prison for 14 years for lying in court and stealing from his clients, appeared on CNN 121 times. 121 times! Does that mean CNN promoted his lies and frauds?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/michael-avenatti-donald-trump-2020/index.html

I never said that I watched Ingraham now. Also, never really watched Carlson. If you count taking a peek every now and then for 5 or so minutes then I guess so. The past couple of years I don't even take a peek at them anymore because of their foolishness. I'm going by what came out during the Dominion civil trial on how these folks operate in which I knew partly already.

 

[Riveting-]

I never said that I watched Ingraham now. Also, never really watched Carlson. If you count taking a peek every now and then for 5 or so minutes then I guess so. The past couple of years I don't even take a peek at them anymore because of their foolishness. I'm going by what came out during the Dominion civil trial on how these folks operate in which I knew partly already.

There was no trial. Nothing came out.

More incoherence on your part, fauxgrad.

 

[Boiler Buck]

I never said that I watched Ingraham now. Also, never really watched Carlson. If you count taking a peek every now and then for 5 or so minutes then I guess so. The past couple of years I don't even take a peek at them anymore because of their foolishness. I'm going by what came out during the Dominion civil trial on how these folks operate in which I knew partly already.

No trial. At least none that had a conclusion of guilt or innocence.

Only a settlement because Fox thought that was cheaper.

News outlets on both sides are paying large settlements for careless writers and careless opinion hosts. I am glad people are holding them financially accountable. Perhaps the only way to positive change?? Fox has had fewer settlements than most.

 

[BNIBoiler]

There was no trial. Nothing came out.

More incoherence on your part, fauxgrad.

Yeah, no trial. Couldn’t remember. But either way the point I’m making is that Carlson’s and other’s lies cost Faux News almost $80 million dollars. Cost Carlson his job. Hannity and Ingraham should have been canned also. Look out for another settlement or trial from another voting machine company with Faux News.

 

[Boiler Buck]

Yeah, no trial. Couldn’t remember. But either way the point I’m making is that Carlson’s and other’s lies cost Faux News almost $80 million dollars. Cost Carlson his job. Hannity and Ingraham should have been canned also. Look out for another settlement or trial from another voting machine company with Faux News.

Thought Carlson got pissed about something entirely different, but still Trump related they told him he couldn't say & so he just left?

 

[BNIBoiler]

Thought Carlson got pissed about something entirely different, but still Trump related they told him he couldn't say & so he just left?

Tucker was fired for sure. Mainly for that Dominion voting machine lies. Also, some racist texts from him that came came out during the Dominion litigation.

 

[Boiler Buck]

Tucker was fired for sure. Mainly for that Dominion voting machine lies. Also, some racist texts from him that came came out during the Dominion litigation.

Could be?? I am not the Fox News expert you are.

 

[Riveting-]

Yeah, no trial. Couldn’t remember. But either way the point I’m making is that Carlson’s and other’s lies cost Faux News almost $80 million dollars. Cost Carlson his job. Hannity and Ingraham should have been canned also. Look out for another settlement or trial from another voting machine company with Faux News.

If you couldn't remember, why did you say it without checking?

Dominion settled for half of what they sued. If they were fully confident in their case and really wanted to redeem their pristine image, they would not have settled at half price, right?

 

[BNIBoiler]

Who knows.