Does this make any sense to you?

[BoilerMadness]

When HRC lost to Trump, she blamed Russian Collusion for the loss. I realized it was BS at the time, but I failed to see the irony in the comment.

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

It's a typical Dem dodge. If you're doing something blatantly wrong, accuse your opponent of doing it first. Any attempt at blaming you, for what you're actually doing, will appear to be a lame retaliation.

 

[Boiler Buck]

When HRC lost to Trump, she blamed Russian Collusion for the loss. I realized it was BS at the time, but I failed to see the irony in the comment.

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

It's a typical Dem dodge. If you're doing something blatantly wrong, accuse your opponent of doing it first. Any attempt at blaming you, for what you're actually doing, will appear to be a lame retaliation.

Knowing the Clintons it is wise to be scared of them. Challenge them & you can suddenly lose your life. Likely one reason why no one challenged her on this fake Russia deal early on....even though like you say it made zero sense.

 

[BuilderBob6]

When HRC lost to Trump, she blamed Russian Collusion for the loss. I realized it was BS at the time, but I failed to see the irony in the comment.

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

It's a typical Dem dodge. If you're doing something blatantly wrong, accuse your opponent of doing it first. Any attempt at blaming you, for what you're actually doing, will appear to be a lame retaliation.

Lol. Maybe because your conclusions are wrong?

 

[Crayfish57]

Lol. Maybe because your conclusions are wrong?

Who would know more about having wrong conclusions than @BuilderBob6 ?

 

[Riveting-]

When HRC lost to Trump, she blamed Russian Collusion for the loss. I realized it was BS at the time, but I failed to see the irony in the comment.

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

It's a typical Dem dodge. If you're doing something blatantly wrong, accuse your opponent of doing it first. Any attempt at blaming you, for what you're actually doing, will appear to be a lame retaliation.

Not to mention, the Russians no doubt had all her emails per her inexplicable stupidity in setting up a private server. That would have been useful for the evil Putin (and CCP, etc)

 

[indy35]

When HRC lost to Trump, she blamed Russian Collusion for the loss. I realized it was BS at the time, but I failed to see the irony in the comment.

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

It's a typical Dem dodge. If you're doing something blatantly wrong, accuse your opponent of doing it first. Any attempt at blaming you, for what you're actually doing, will appear to be a lame retaliation.

You fail to understand a lot of things, this is no different. It's not entirely your fault, although your weak mind did give the propaganda the opening it needed.

 

[charlespig]

Why would Russia (Socialist) be opposed to any Democrat (Socialist) being elected? Wouldn't they want like minded individuals in power here, so they could assimilate us to the Great Socialist Collective more easily?

Urrr, I can't tell if you are genuinely ignorant, or just intentionally asking dumb questions. The "socialism" of Russia is not nearly the same thing as the "socialism" of the Democrats. But ignorant people with a binary worldview can only see "socialism" and "not socialism," and anything that can be remotely linked to socialism will be in the former group and assume they are the same. It's like infants who can only differentiate "things that he can eat" and "things that he cannot eat," and equate a genuine gold coin as a lego mini-figure, b/c both are things that he cannot eat.

For one, political spectrum is not binary. Heck, it isn't even one dimensional (left vs. right). You can have a 2-D view and there are all kinds of ideology without clear boundary (it is certainly not as clear cut as the chart below, but to get an idea sometimes it is helpful to dumb it down to make it easier to understand). Mainstream Democrat like Biden identify themselves as liberals (liberalism), while Bernie Sanders identifies himself as social democrat (social democracy). Neither consider themselves as socialism or communism, but yet if there is an ignorant conservative (conservatism) who sees anything not in blue as "socialism", he wouldn't be able to tell the difference. In his narrow mind, it's just "good guys" (in blue), and "bad guys" (everything not blue).