Does anyone else think the poll about Haarms fist pumps is silly?
Does anyone else think the poll about Haarms...
- Thread starter stout1
- Start date
This is the same forum where people complain about a 44% 3-pt shooter taking open shots. Silly is relative.
Sorry, but there are no write-in votes. Please choose one of the available options.
If you would like I can mark you down for the last one.
44% is great for almost all situations, but there exist potential situations where a 60% shooter from the three shouldn't shoot on a team when in double bonus..up 3 and the last possession with ball handlers that shoot 75% of the time from the line...or domination at the 5 with the opposing team's 5 with four fouls. Still, I get the gist and 44% is great for almost all of the game and some games ALL the time.
Lot of skill on this Purdue team and that is why teams currently play straight up on Haas to keep D on the perimeter...
Sorry, TJ. My reference was a bit obscure. That was the "Biggie should never shoot a 3" crowd.44% is great for almost all situations, but there exist potential situations where a 60% shooter from the three shouldn't shoot on a team when in double bonus..up 3 and the last possession with ball handlers that shoot 75% of the time from the line...or domination at the 5 with the opposing team's 5 with four fouls. Still, I get the gist and 44% is great for almost all of the game and some games ALL the time.
no problem...just thought I would throw out a situation where even 44% might not be good enough. I think we will see the day that 50% is somewhat common...especially if the game moves even more offensive as far as rules...
Similar threads
