And to think some here actually wanted this guy considered for the permanent job. Wow. Never was 0-6 so celebrated.
this is going to be real hard, but I have to say I totally agree with TC4THREE.
Yes, we almost beat IU, but the fact is , when presented with a chance to win, we still LOST !!! I have to believe no matter who the coach was , we would have been fired up for that game. and the result was the same.
I also have to believe the players were fired up to play Nebraska because it was the first game after Hazell was fired.
Yes, the passing game looked a lot better during Parker's 6 games as coach. I attribute that to being behind early and trying to play catch up. other teams allowed us to pass as they protected their lead. Losing 62-24 to a Penn St didn't seem to be to be playing inspired football to me. Take away the IU game, and Purdue was losing by an average of 24.2 points per game in the other 5 games parker coached. In that same stretch, our defense gave up an average of 45 points a game.
I'll give Purdue fans who loved Parker some props. He probably was the best coach on the team this past year, and definitely the best recruiter. I'll leave it at that. his record speaks for itself. More inspired play than for Hazell? ok, sure. I didn't really see much difference other than we passed the ball more often. Our defense sure wasn't inspired or prepared to play. I guess that was the def coordinator's fault and of course lack of depth and injuries, and , and ,and . and.
Bottom line; we sucked ! Move on.