It isn’t just coaching. It’s recruiting. Hiring someone without experience is a fools errand.
also, for all the shit diaco took, the linebackers were vastly improved this year. Look at the leap Alexander took. Scheme was an issue but diaco could coach his position.
It could be, yet, not always the case...and, if there was ever anyone that I would take a chance on, he would be at the top of the list.
And, as long as we are disagreeing on things today, I don't share the same sentiment regarding Diaco...the LBs were not good at all...I guess the fact that they were not good the year before either makes it so that maybe you could argue that they were not as bad as the year before, but, even if it were true, it would only be by the slimmest of margins...it has as much to do probably with personnel at the position, as that is a HUGE issue, but, by no means was LB a position of strength for Purdue, and, it has not been since Bailey went down unfortunately.
Frankly...I don't think Diaco is good in any way, and, that he essentially stole money from Purdue (and others)...and, again, he was hired at Purdue based on his vast experience, only to find out just how bad he really was...I may be in the minority, but, I would have gladly taken Rosevelt Colvin as a LB coach, and, I would be flat out stunned if he was not a more capable LB coach than Diaco.