Are bowl games exhibitions or are they of equal (or more) importance as other games?
I think what bothers people the most is inconsistency regarding this issue. The games (and high price ticket and travel packages) are sold as the latter, while coaches and players treat them largely as the former.
With player opt-outs and coaches leaving for other jobs, it seems those involved in the sport have spoken. Outside of the CFP, the bowl games have become glorified exhibitions. With so many bowl games, some teams have even declined invites. Bowl games are becoming as competitively juiced as the pro bowl. Pretty soon they'll be changing the rules to 2-hand touch to entice star players to play.
I think fans would react better to this situation if W/L record was not on the line, just the bowl trophy itself. Then it's all upside, which is as it should be as reward for a successful season.
I think what bothers people the most is inconsistency regarding this issue. The games (and high price ticket and travel packages) are sold as the latter, while coaches and players treat them largely as the former.
With player opt-outs and coaches leaving for other jobs, it seems those involved in the sport have spoken. Outside of the CFP, the bowl games have become glorified exhibitions. With so many bowl games, some teams have even declined invites. Bowl games are becoming as competitively juiced as the pro bowl. Pretty soon they'll be changing the rules to 2-hand touch to entice star players to play.
I think fans would react better to this situation if W/L record was not on the line, just the bowl trophy itself. Then it's all upside, which is as it should be as reward for a successful season.