Early lines that I am seeing have Boilers favored by 4 over Minnesota
Fuller won't play, Jones not sure if he will be 100 %, but Purdue has Knox, Worship and Lankford-Johnson, they can do the job.
Northwestern in 2014, we lostAnyone remember the last time the Boilers were favored at home in a B1G game??????
Both Minnesota starting safeties may be out. Got to factor that in, too.I wonder how many folks betting on Purdue (outside of Purdue fans) understand that we have two key defensive starters sitting out suspensions the entire 1H, our #1 RB is definitely out, our #2 RB may (or may not) be back and may (or may not) be 100%, and our starting QB has an injured shoulder that kept him sidelined all last week (and probably less than full-out practice this week).
At full strength, those odds make sense to me, but we have too many question marks to feel good enough about this game to bet it.
If Purdue can have limited time on D the first half and gather a lead I think they bring the W.I wonder how many folks betting on Purdue (outside of Purdue fans) understand that we have two key defensive starters sitting out suspensions the entire 1H, our #1 RB is definitely out, our #2 RB may (or may not) be back and may (or may not) be 100%, and our starting QB has an injured shoulder that kept him sidelined all last week (and probably less than full-out practice this week).
At full strength, those odds make sense to me, but we have too many question marks to feel good enough about this game to bet it.
I wonder how many folks betting on Purdue (outside of Purdue fans) understand that we have two key defensive starters sitting out suspensions the entire 1H, our #1 RB is definitely out, our #2 RB may (or may not) be back and may (or may not) be 100%, and our starting QB has an injured shoulder that kept him sidelined all last week (and probably less than full-out practice this week).
At full strength, those odds make sense to me, but we have too many question marks to feel good enough about this game to bet it.
I say hurts Purdue....we need our passing game to stretch the field.wish the forecast would improve.
does a rain game help or hurt purdue?
especially with some ?s at RB
A sloppy game favors the team that is able to focus on the small things and do those small things well....I like Brohm's coaching ability in that aspect and the prep he has worked on since his arrival. Purdue does the small things well and typically doesn't beat itself.I say hurts Purdue....we need our passing game to stretch the field.
Plus we need Jones to not fumble......I cringe when he gets the ball.....love his effort but he fumbles too much....the rain doesn't help that.
Boilers still win but the rain will make it sloppy.....
Hey Purdue fans, I'm a Gophers fan who decided to see what the other side is saying. Greetings from the Maroon and Gold!
So I love you Boiler fans, and God bless you and all, but when did Purdue get so good that you can assume wins against teams that have been better? I'm wondering what you've seen from your team, or is this just fan hubris? Maybe we just have a complex up here in MN, but our attitude tends to be the opposite - we assume losses even when our team is good.
I say hurts Purdue....we need our passing game to stretch the field.
Plus we need Jones to not fumble......I cringe when he gets the ball.....love his effort but he fumbles too much....the rain doesn't help that.
Boilers still win but the rain will make it sloppy.....
Well it shouldn't matter, but it does. With wind you have elements out of your control that make throwing the ball unpredictable. With rain and snow, you have elements that potentially impede the ability of the player to catch the ball but doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to do it.
(2) Minnesota has beaten three teams that range from bad to mediocre and lost by 7 to a team that averages 39 pts a game and pinned 51 on Texas.
Hey Purdue fans, I'm a Gophers fan who decided to see what the other side is saying. Greetings from the Maroon and Gold!
So I love you Boiler fans, and God bless you and all, but when did Purdue get so good that you can assume wins against teams that have been better? I'm wondering what you've seen from your team, or is this just fan hubris? Maybe we just have a complex up here in MN, but our attitude tends to be the opposite - we assume losses even when our team is good.
I am missing all these posts that are assuming a win.Hey Purdue fans, I'm a Gophers fan who decided to see what the other side is saying. Greetings from the Maroon and Gold!
So I love you Boiler fans, and God bless you and all, but when did Purdue get so good that you can assume wins against teams that have been better? I'm wondering what you've seen from your team, or is this just fan hubris? Maybe we just have a complex up here in MN, but our attitude tends to be the opposite - we assume losses even when our team is good.
You make some good persuasive points. On the other hand, I could write a bunch of paragraphs to say that
(1) Purdue has beaten a bad team and a mediocre team and lost to the two better teams they've played.
(2) Minnesota has beaten three teams that range from bad to mediocre and lost by 7 to a team that averages 39 pts a game and pinned 51 on Texas.
Purdue has injuries, Minnesota has injuries, both teams have dynamic young coaches, blah blah...but Purdue has gone 11-40 in the last 4+ seasons and Minnesota is coming off a 9-4 campaign.
Hey Purdue fans, I'm a Gophers fan who decided to see what the other side is saying. Greetings from the Maroon and Gold!
So I love you Boiler fans, and God bless you and all, but when did Purdue get so good that you can assume wins against teams that have been better? I'm wondering what you've seen from your team, or is this just fan hubris? Maybe we just have a complex up here in MN, but our attitude tends to be the opposite - we assume losses even when our team is good.
Hey Purdue fans, I'm a Gophers fan who decided to see what the other side is saying. Greetings from the Maroon and Gold!
So I love you Boiler fans, and God bless you and all, but when did Purdue get so good that you can assume wins against teams that have been better? I'm wondering what you've seen from your team, or is this just fan hubris? Maybe we just have a complex up here in MN, but our attitude tends to be the opposite - we assume losses even when our team is good.
28 Purdue 24 MN it will be close.I'll break it down for you. You are dealing with a school that has been average at best for 8 years and an absolute dumpster fire for the last 4. There are things to be excited about and he are jumping on board clinging to hope to be great again. CJB is one of the best coaches in football and has orchestrated an incredible turn around. If Purdue gets to and wins a bowl game it will be one of the most impressive turnarounds in history. The team had no fight and no direction for so long.
You are also on a Purdue site, so of course there is going to be skewed optimism. Especially when Purdue is listed as the favorite in a conference game (it's been 4 years for that).
Check back in after the game. If Purdue loses, I assure you it won't be because of our optimism. If they win, some of us may take credit, but that too has nothing to do with us. I say Purdue wins 27-16, but it's close. I think, as always with this team, Purdue needs to get out to a lead early. Especially with 2 starters suspended for the first half.
This game is the measuring stick for the season. Minnesota is a good team and it's a conference game. If Purdue manages to get a win here, a bowl seems inevitable if they continue to improve.