ADVERTISEMENT

Big Ten Pre-Season Rankings

Mar 26, 2016
11
1
3
#1 Indiana (for obvious reasons)
#2 MSU
#3 Wisconsin
#4 Michigan
#5 Maryland
#6 Ohio State
#7 Iowa
#8 Illinois
#9 Purdue
#10 Noethwestern
#11 Penn State
#12 Nebraska
#13 Minnesota
#14 Rutgers
 
IU wacko on another teams board, normal for someone who has no clue what they are doing! Must be a challenge to stay alive
 
#1 Indiana (for obvious reasons)
#2 MSU
#3 Wisconsin
#4 Michigan
#5 Maryland
#6 Ohio State
#7 Iowa
#8 Illinois
#9 Purdue
#10 Noethwestern
#11 Penn State
#12 Nebraska
#13 Minnesota
#14 Rutgers
It looks like ol' TrailerParkHoosier is working on his 8th screen name. Obsession can be such a terrible waste.
 
#1 Indiana (for obvious reasons)
#2 MSU
#3 Wisconsin
#4 Michigan
#5 Maryland
#6 Ohio State
#7 Iowa
#8 Illinois
#9 Purdue
#10 Noethwestern
#11 Penn State
#12 Nebraska
#13 Minnesota
#14 Rutgers[/QUOTE

Not a bad try, if you had put Purdue ahead of Iowa and Illinois you could even have attempted to defend your position.
 
Last edited:
How is OSU 6? They lose much of the talent they had and were underwhelming last year...Illinois just lost a key player and purdue beat them by about 40 in their last match up. Iowa will be very young and will be mediocre at best. Michigan should be solid, but I'd imagine a clone of last years expectations. They are very young as well. Purdue should have an even better starting 5 than last year with only slightly less depth assuming players make slight improvements in their game. Purdue should be a very consistent team next year, well rounded with only a few shortcomings.
 
How is OSU 6? They lose much of the talent they had and were underwhelming last year...Illinois just lost a key player and purdue beat them by about 40 in their last match up. Iowa will be very young and will be mediocre at best. Michigan should be solid, but I'd imagine a clone of last years expectations. They are very young as well. Purdue should have an even better starting 5 than last year with only slightly less depth assuming players make slight improvements in their game. Purdue should be a very consistent team next year, well rounded with only a few shortcomings.

How does OSU lose "much of the talent they had"? Looks to me like they were pretty young last year and have a lot of good players back, they should be better.

I would be surprised if Iowa doesn't take a huge step back and Illinois seems to have a ways to go, picking them ahead of Purdue is just trolling.
 
How does OSU lose "much of the talent they had"? Looks to me like they were pretty young last year and have a lot of good players back, they should be better.

I would be surprised if Iowa doesn't take a huge step back and Illinois seems to have a ways to go, picking them ahead of Purdue is just trolling.

Osu had an excellent class coming in last year, and I think the only one remaining is Jaquan Lyle. Looking at their commits they had 4 4 star recruits leave. So all the young guys with potential left minus Lyle, and are replaced by more freshman that is a much weaker class than 2015. Will they be good? Sure. I see them pretty similar to last year except maybe they don't tank non conference like last year.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT