ADVERTISEMENT

Another airliner crashes, obviously a bomb or pilot intent

My hunch is that a Methodist or a Baptist did it this time.

Probably because if it was a Muslim Obama and his Commie government will just say it was a conspiracy theory. Muslims never commit terror attacks that is why they run the TSA now. Any real government would put them in charge of airport security if they really were genuinely concerned about security. Why have a border either. Obama is gonna make sure it was a Baptist that committed that attack make no mistake.
 
Or an avionics fire.

You'd think you would've learned after the last time you did this and it wasn't a terrorist or even a Muslim involved... but I guess not.
 
Or an avionics fire.

You'd think you would've learned after the last time you did this and it wasn't a terrorist or even a Muslim involved... but I guess not.
I'd lean towards a bomb but it would be a WAG and the proper thing is to wait for the actual evidence, and now that they have the black boxes, that evidence should come quickly. But I guess waiting a short period of time isn't as satisfying as the alternative for some.
 
I'd lean towards a bomb but it would be a WAG and the proper thing is to wait for the actual evidence, and now that they have the black boxes, that evidence should come quickly. But I guess waiting a short period of time isn't as satisfying as the alternative for some.
waiting is the best approach but we would also need to avoid watching the "news" as it is non stop speculation. LOL
 
I think the more time that passes without: (1) any group taking responsibility; and (2) any government with the means to do so proclaiming evidence of an explosion, it becomes more likely that this was actually caused by mechanical failure.
 
I think the more time that passes without: (1) any group taking responsibility; and (2) any government with the means to do so proclaiming evidence of an explosion, it becomes more likely that this was actually caused by mechanical failure.
The no group taking responsibility is certainly a possible indicator that it wasn't terrorism. It could be a rogue (or even a rouge) agent I suppose so that no formal group knows to take responsibility...but yeah, I've been waiting for that and the absence of it does suggests non-terrorists.

If that's what happens, no worries, no one will call out Trump for jumping right to it, or credit Clinton for waiting for evidence.
 
The white/male/american guilt is strong with this one....
someone is making assumptions about my background that I find amusing. Why would I have guilt over what someone did in Africa that has no relationship to me? Do tell.
 
someone is making assumptions about my background that I find amusing. Why would I have guilt over what someone did in Africa that has no relationship to me? Do tell.

I'd assume you are AT LEAST 2 of those and the immense guilt and privilege you feel for belonging to those groups is the only way you could logically feel the way you do and spout the bullshit that you do on these boards. The Clinton machine's done a hell of a job brainwashing you. All the way back to 92'
 
I'd assume you are AT LEAST 2 of those and the immense guilt and privilege you feel for belonging to those groups is the only way you could logically feel the way you do and spout the bullshit that you do on these boards. The Clinton machine's done a hell of a job brainwashing you. All the way back to 92'
ah so this isn't about actually the fact that there was a Christian element to the Hutu/Tutsi conflict/massacre, just generally "libtard" commentary.

Got it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT