ADVERTISEMENT

Angry leftists won’t even let you eat dine in peace

It’s sad when you can’t even dine without politics and leftist anger being involved. Why are leftists so discontent?

It's the party of lack of impulse control, it's the party of BLM (Burn Loot Murder), it's the party that has absolute eomotional outrage meltdowns when they don't get their way.
Don't you remember crazy wigged Maxine Waters, tell the dem followers to do exactly this?
 
It's the party of lack of impulse control, it's the party of BLM (Burn Loot Murder), it's the party that has absolute eomotional outrage meltdowns when they don't get their way.
Don't you remember crazy wigged Maxine Waters, tell the dem followers to do exactly this?
The blind allegiance to the Democratic Party (see BNIBoiler’s cult-like quote from last night) from some people on this board doesn’t make much sense.
 
What a baby. He's one of the most powerful people in the country. If he can't take public scrutiny, maybe he shouldn't have taken the job.
Yeah because being threatened while he is trying to just have a meal is "public scrutiny" let alone it is illegal to do that to a Judge. But it's (D)ifferent so it's okay with you.... end the hypocrisy once.

If this was a bunch of GOP people doing it to one of the left-leaning judges, you'd be the first one clamoring for them all to be strung from a tree.
 
What a baby. He's one of the most powerful people in the country. If he can't take public scrutiny, maybe he shouldn't have taken the job.

I doubt his fear was for himself. Unlikely he was eating alone. Most likely there with his family- should his wife and children (if any; I admit I do not know) be subject to this? The "public scrutiny " (is that what we are calling it now?) should be limited to public venues like government offices and maybe the Supreme Court building, just a thought.
 
I doubt his fear was for himself. Unlikely he was eating alone. Most likely there with his family- should his wife and children (if any; I admit I do not know) be subject to this? The "public scrutiny " (is that what we are calling it now?) should be limited to public venues like government offices and maybe the Supreme Court building, just a thought.
He has the freedom to eat dinner at home then. Free speech is in the constitution. Having a nice meal at the Cheesecake Factory isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan

Details​

  • Condition
    Used - Fair
Look at all of this free wood 🪵 to perform many wonderous tasks and deeds. The best part, it's all absolutely 💯 free. All of our project wood in front of the building near the garage, in the wonderful shade 😎, I absolutely 💯 free!!! Now you can make all of your project dreams ✨️ come true! Located at our Bob the Builder Bridgman location, 9600 Red Arrow Highway, open every day 11am to 5pm. No holds and pick up only please.

287194838_5499589263387064_4890758579186539998_n.jpg


Straight from Face Book Marketplace.
 
So Pete's OK with "peaceful protest". Its kind of like Bill's question about what "is" is. Is he OK with what most Americans consider peaceful protest or is he including looting and burning down buildings?
I don't know who Bill is.

I think Pete was pretty clear. Does he have to specifically say he's not ok with burning and looting? I mean JFC man.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
He has the freedom to eat dinner at home then. Free speech is in the constitution. Having a nice meal at the Cheesecake Factory isn't.

Has it gotten this bad that it's acceptable in society for people to track judges and offer bounties for their whereabouts because you disagree with a decision they made?

We continue to speak of the danger of right wing hatred. Meanwhile, pro abortion activists are spewing vile hatred at these judges because of a ruling. It will eventually turn violent, and then what will the excuses be? It's OK because it was my right to get an abortion?
 
Has it gotten this bad that it's acceptable in society for people to track judges and offer bounties for their whereabouts because you disagree with a decision they made?

We continue to speak of the danger of right wing hatred. Meanwhile, pro abortion activists are spewing vile hatred at these judges because of a ruling. It will eventually turn violent, and then what will the excuses be? It's OK because it was my right to get an abortion?
It's not acceptable.
Violence is not the solution to problems......on either side of the argument.

But.......vile hated at judges? Abortion workers have been MURDERED. I believe 8 since Roe was originally enacted.

Just looked it up. Numbers are of 2015.
Since 1977 there have been eight murders, 17 attempted murders, 42 bombings, and 186 arsons targeted at abortion clinics and providers across the country.

So it already turned violent, this is a continuation by the other side.

There is no excuse for this kind of violence. Unfortunately our society seems to be going backwards and the crazies feel emboldened.

The level of anger and the incitement of it on both sides has to stop.
 
I don't know who Bill is.

I think Pete was pretty clear. Does he have to specifically say he's not ok with burning and looting? I mean JFC man.
Yes he does have to say violent looting, burning and destroying peoples businesses and livelihoods is bad.
Maxine Watters on the other hand had no problem promoting the violence.
Trump was asked numerous times to denounce white supremacists and did.
Why hasn't any Democrat been asked to condemn BLM after the looting and burning of businesses and public buildings?
Has any Democrat condemned the 2 years of violence promoted by the BLM agenda?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
It's not acceptable.
Violence is not the solution to problems......on either side of the argument.

But.......vile hated at judges? Abortion workers have been MURDERED. I believe 8 since Roe was originally enacted.

Just looked it up. Numbers are of 2015.
Since 1977 there have been eight murders, 17 attempted murders, 42 bombings, and 186 arsons targeted at abortion clinics and providers across the country.

So it already turned violent, this is a continuation by the other side.

There is no excuse for this kind of violence. Unfortunately our society seems to be going backwards and the crazies feel emboldened.

The level of anger and the incitement of it on both sides has to stop.
You just made my point. Where is the condemnation from the WH and Congress on harassment and hatred toward Supreme Court Justices? I haven't heard it or seen it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris P Bacon
Yes he does have to say violent looting, burning and destroying peoples businesses and livelihoods is bad.
Maxine Watters on the other hand had no problem promoting the violence.
Trump was asked numerous times to denounce white supremacists and did.
Why hasn't any Democrat been asked to condemn BLM after the looting and burning of businesses and public buildings?
Has any Democrat condemned the 2 years of violence promoted by the BLM agenda?
Ahhhh. This about BLM. Still going on about that.

Lol. So he's against violence, harassment, and intimidation of public officials but could possibly be FOR burning, looting, and destruction.

Maxine Waters is the Jim Jordan of the Democratic party. How many other Dems promoted the violence? Again, let's all label the other party according to the most extreme people in it and be outraged.

As for trump, he did denounce white supremacy...........after he failed to at the debate......the one that included his infamous "Stand back and stand by" comment about the Proud Boys.

Democrats DID denounce the violence from the BLM protests. C'mon. At least know wtf you're talking about.

2 years of violence? Now you're making stuff up .
 
You just made my point. Where is the condemnation from the WH and Congress on harassment and hatred toward Supreme Court Justices? I haven't heard it or seen it.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
Ahhhh. This about BLM. Still going on about that.

Lol. So he's against violence, harassment, and intimidation of public officials but could possibly be FOR burning, looting, and destruction.

Maxine Waters is the Jim Jordan of the Democratic party. How many other Dems promoted the violence? Again, let's all label the other party according to the most extreme people in it and be outraged.

As for trump, he did denounce white supremacy...........after he failed to at the debate......the one that included his infamous "Stand back and stand by" comment about the Proud Boys.

Democrats DID denounce the violence from the BLM protests. C'mon. At least know wtf you're talking about.

2 years of violence? Now you're making stuff up .
Well the second highest ranking Democrat had a go fund me page to bail the rioters out of jail.
Soooo there's that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
Good for you. All your uninformed accusations shown to be wrong and you change the subject.
OMG you said no other Dem supported BLM and KH bailed them out of jail.
I'm not going to research whether the BLM riots lasted 2 years or 21 monthes.
Watch something other than MSNBC and come back and call me uninformed.
 

Biden hasn't even come close to condemning the protests outside of the Justices homes. In fact, Jen Psaki had stated that he encourages it.

“I know that there’s an outrage right now, I guess, about protests that have been peaceful to date, and we certainly do continue to encourage that, outside judges’ homes, and that’s the president’s position.”


 
Has it gotten this bad that it's acceptable in society for people to track judges and offer bounties for their whereabouts because you disagree with a decision they made?

We continue to speak of the danger of right wing hatred. Meanwhile, pro abortion activists are spewing vile hatred at these judges because of a ruling. It will eventually turn violent, and then what will the excuses be? It's OK because it was my right to get an abortion?
Oh for heavens’ sake. Right wing hatred v “spewing VILE hatred” by pro abortion activists (mostly women) Now you are equating pro abortion activists with the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, et al.
 
Oh for heavens’ sake. Right wing hatred v “spewing VILE hatred” by pro abortion activists (mostly women) Now you are equating pro abortion activists with the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, et al.
Sorry, when these people threaten to kill USSC justices and their families and harass them in public places (restaurants while they’re are eating) and in front of their homes, they are no better than the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.
 
Oh for heavens’ sake. Right wing hatred v “spewing VILE hatred” by pro abortion activists (mostly women) Now you are equating pro abortion activists with the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, et al.
If you're harassing/protesting Justices at their home (which is illegal), putting bounties on their locations in public places while harassing them there, and in at least one case threatening their lives, you are no better than a Proud Boy or Oath Keeper. So because they're mostly women protesting something you agree with, that makes it OK?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
OMG you said no other Dem supported BLM and KH bailed them out of jail.
I'm not going to research whether the BLM riots lasted 2 years or 21 monthes.
Watch something other than MSNBC and come back and call me uninformed.
You're an idiot. I didn't say no other Dem supported BLM. I asked how many others, like Waters, promoted the violence. I said nothing about Harris, you did.

You can't even understand basic sentences. Bye.
 
Kavanaugh didn't even know the protestors were OUTSIDE the front of the restaurant. He was informed they were there and left out the rear exit. Stop the misinformation.

Having said that, this stuff shouldn't be happening. It's ridiculous.

To compare protestors outside a restaurant to gun toting insurrectionists calling for the overturning of an election.......and in some cases a civil war, is the epitome of false equivalence. Jesus.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT