He looked at a poll and sees how unpopular it is. Remember, it’s all about raw power to Democrats. They’ll change their stance on anything for power. Isn’t that right, @indy35 ?
What Dems are promoting CRT in K-12 schools? Conservatives are the ones in an uproar about something not even being taught in K-12. Beto is telling the truth and nothing out of the ordinary. I don’t know what he said before on the CRT issue but in the clip he said that “we don’t see CRT being taught in our schools right now. It’s a course that is being taught in law schools”. When asked about whether that should it be taught. He said no. I agree. CRT should remain being taught in law schools. It is an advance topic. CRT has never been taught in K-12 schools.
What I don’t like is that conservatives have taken issue of what is taught in schools, particularly the horrible stuff that happened in black history. They call that CRT and now want that part of history removed from schools. Last year folks in PA tried to ban children’s books about Rosa Parks and MLK because they don’t want their kids to feel bad. Give me a break.
Of course your school taught that stuff like they did in mine and every one else’s school back in the day and no one thought nothing of it. I guess cancel culture is alive and well today, because in some school districts parts of black history is getting removed or attempted to under the guise of CRT.Such a simple, bad faith argument. No one wants rasism, The Civel War, MLK, Jim Crowe, voting rights...etc removed from schools. My schools taught them all and I lived in a town of barely 2000 people in the '80s
Racial Pedagogy is what people are discussing.
It is also naive to think that CRT isn't in k-12. Its the pedegogy. Quit the obscication.
That's because he's running for governor in Texas. This guy is total dog shit. Anyone who elects him deserves what they're getting...He looked at a poll and sees how unpopular it is. Remember, it’s all about raw power to Democrats. They’ll change their stance on anything for power. Isn’t that right, @indy35 ?
Hmm. Sounds like Biden/Harris voters.That's because he's running for governor in Texas. This guy is total dog shit. Anyone who elects him deserves what they're getting...
I imagine CRT wouldn’t fly very far in Texas. Beta’s just doing what he had to do politically. In about 2 years, he may flip to being a RepublicanHe looked at a poll and sees how unpopular it is. Remember, it’s all about raw power to Democrats. They’ll change their stance on anything for power. Isn’t that right, @indy35 ?
You’re a joke. My 4th grader wrote a paper on Brown versus the Board of Education for black history month, which I have no problem with. It’s the other crap that comes in JR high school that I have a problem with.Of course your school taught that stuff like they did in mine and every one else’s school back in the day and no one thought nothing of it. I guess cancel culture is alive and well today, because in some school districts parts of black history is getting removed or attempted to under the guise of CRT.
It is not naive. You really think 3rd graders are discussing court cases like Plessy vs. Ferguson, Dredd Scott Decision, or Brown vs Board of Education? Even non high school history class. Those were mentioned in our history books but far from any CRT type depth.
They are one proud voting base to be sure.Hmm. Sounds like Biden/Harris voters.
That is another point of mine about CRT. Teaching that white 10 year olds are oppressors today is NOT CRT. I don’t know what that is if they are teaching that but it ain’t CRT.You’re a joke. My 4th grader wrote a paper on Brown versus the Board of Education for black history month, which I have no problem with. It’s the other crap that comes in JR high school that I have a problem with.
Teaching equality is fine. Teaching that white 10 yr olds are oppressors today….is a little over the top for 10-15 yr olds.
These “experts” failed to acknowledge incidents like what happened at R.I. Meyerholz Elementary School in California, where third graders were told to see themselves as either oppressor or oppressed.That is another point of mine about CRT. Teaching that white 10 year olds are oppressors today is NOT CRT. I don’t know what that is if they are teaching that but it ain’t CRT.
Yes, whatever they teaching should not be taught in schools. Again whatever this is, is not CRT. CRT is the discussion or teaching how racism interjects with the legal system. Systemic racism basically. Teaching blacks that they will never be anything or teaching white kids to feel guilty about being oppressors is not teaching how racism interjects in the legal system thus should not be called CRT from both sides. Just because the black dude says that it is CRT does not mean it is so. Just because it is still an advanced topic, the real CRT should be taught in K-12 either; it never was taught.These “experts” failed to acknowledge incidents like what happened at R.I. Meyerholz Elementary School in California, where third graders were told to see themselves as either oppressor or oppressed.
![]()
When anti-racism is just more racism: Yes, a form of CRT is being taught in schools | opinion
Whenever someone denies that CRT is in our children’s classrooms, they are either mistaken or dishonest.amp.ydr.com
![]()
Woke Elementary
An elementary school in Cupertino, California—a Silicon Valley community with a median home price of $2.3 million—recently forced a class of third-graders to deconstruct their racial identities, then rank themselves according to their “power and privilege.” Based on whistleblower documents and...www.city-journal.org
my favorite line….
Asian-Americans are the “inconvenient minority”: they significantly outperform all other racial groups, including whites, in terms of academic achievement, college admissions, household income, family stability, and other key measures. Affirmative action and other critical race theory-based programs would devastate their admissions to universities and harm their futures.
and you say it’s not being taught in schools. The only reason it’s “not being taught” is because people are speaking out against CRT being taught. If not, the proliferation of CRT would continue. (BTW, as I have stated, I have zero problem with this being taught in college.)
Sadly, I think you don’t realize how the far left teachers like to take liberties with concepts and run with them. You may not think they are CRT, but that’s what they think they are trying to teach.Yes, whatever they teaching should not be taught in schools. Again whatever this is, is not CRT. CRT is the discussion or teaching how racism interjects with the legal system. Systemic racism basically. Teaching blacks that they will never be anything or teaching white kids to feel guilty about being oppressors is not teaching how racism interjects in the legal system thus should not be called CRT from both sides. Just because the black dude says that it is CRT does not mean it is so. Just because it is still an advanced topic, the real CRT should be taught in K-12 either; it never was taught.
Perhaps.Sadly, I think you don’t realize how the far left teachers like to take liberties with concepts and run with them. You may not think they are CRT, but that’s what they think they are trying to teach.
Black history is fine, I was taught it and I think everyone can learn from it. Keep the spin in college. Or maybe even HS social studies at (Jr or Sr year) but becoming a dominating topic is over the top for HSers.Perhaps.
What I don’t like is when the right wingers try to remove real black history topics or books that they don’t like under the guise of CRT.
Because you have this rigid view of CRT. It's not rigid and I don't know how many times I have to prove that to you. You're too stubborn to learn anything outside of your little world view.Yes, whatever they teaching should not be taught in schools. Again whatever this is, is not CRT. CRT is the discussion or teaching how racism interjects with the legal system. Systemic racism basically. Teaching blacks that they will never be anything or teaching white kids to feel guilty about being oppressors is not teaching how racism interjects in the legal system thus should not be called CRT from both sides. Just because the black dude says that it is CRT does not mean it is so. Just because it is still an advanced topic, the real CRT should be taught in K-12 either; it never was taught.
I don't think anyone wants to remove black history from schools. Slavery happened. Oppression with Jim Crow happened. Everyone needs to understand that. What they don't need to understand as children are that white people are somehow "privileged". That's the part that people have a problem with...Perhaps.
What I don’t like is when the right wingers try to remove real black history topics or books that they don’t like under the guise of CRT.
White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.I don't think anyone wants to remove black history from schools. Slavery happened. Oppression with Jim Crow happened. Everyone needs to understand that. What they don't need to understand as children are that white people are somehow "privileged". That's the part that people have a problem with...
So white people are privileged because the justice system works the way it should and was designed?White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.
Black people are privileged. Have you seen how many of y’all are getting released after committing crimes these days? Everybody caters to blacks these days. You get protected by the government and media. That’s privilege. Must be nice.White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.
He's not black.Black people are privileged. Have you seen how many of y’all are getting released after committing crimes these days? Everybody caters to blacks these days. You get protected by the government and media. That’s privilege. Must be nice.
No, you are privileged when you are white and drunk and kill a family of 4 and only get 10 years probation. The only jail time served was to await trial.So white people are privileged because the justice system works the way it should and was designed?
I think you mean to say blacks are underprivileged when it comes to the justice system. Not the other way around...
71% of black children are born to single mothers.White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.
Is he one of those Shaun King posers who identities as black just so receive all of the privilege that comes along with being black?He's not black.
Bullshit. This is a false narrative that has been proven wrong so many times. You just refuse to listen.White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.
Hiring the best lawyers is not the same as privilege, white or otherwise. To bring up OJ, like y’all always do means that you clearly do not understand white privilege. What got OJ acquitted was the combination of racist LA cops being exposed and sloppy crime scene forensics.Bullshit. This is a false narrative that has been proven wrong so many times. You just refuse to listen.
OJ Simpson anyone?
Didn’t OJ kill two white people? Would that be considered a hate crime if the roles were reversed?Hiring the best lawyers is not the same as privilege, white or otherwise. To bring up OJ, like y’all always do means that you clearly do not understand white privilege. What got OJ acquitted was the combination of racist LA cops being exposed and sloppy crime scene forensics.
For the sake of argument that OJ indeed killed the ex-wife and friend. That by itself is not considered a hate crime. The bar for hate crimes is set high. Killing 2 people, that happens to belong to another race, in a jealous rage is not a hate crime. However, if OJ yelled racial slurs, wrote racial slurs on the the bodies, or sent racial notes to Nicole prior to the incident, then that may constitute a hate crime depending what the law actually says about that matter.Didn’t OJ kill two white people? Would that be considered a hate crime if the roles were reversed?
Is this part of the justice system for blacks? Out on the street after multiple violent crimes, including a previous attack on a mother and child? Is that the justice system you're actually bitching about? Give me a f'ing break...White people are privileged. You don’t need any school to iterate that. For starters, there are 2 justice systems one for blacks and one for whites.
Jussie Smollett just got convicted on 5 of 6 charges, which each had a 3 year jail term.No, you are privileged when you are white and drunk and kill a family of 4 and only get 10 years probation. The only jail time served was to await trial.
Two women in Ohio separately commit similar offenses. The same judge in both cases gives the black woman a harsher sentence. The white woman even has a more egregious criminal history. Nothing new, the basic status quo in the US.
The whole concept of a Hate crime is monumentally stupid.For the sake of argument that OJ indeed killed the ex-wife and friend. That by itself is not considered a hate crime. The bar for hate crimes is set high. Killing 2 people, that happens to belong to another race, in a jealous rage is not a hate crime. However, if OJ yelled racial slurs, wrote racial slurs on the the bodies, or sent racial notes to Nicole prior to the incident, then that may constitute a hate crime depending what the law actually says about that matter.
So, I guess you are against the Emmitt Till Anti-Lynching Bill that was just passed bi-partisan in the House and the Senate last week.The whole concept of a Hate crime is monumentally stupid.
If someone randomly kills you and he gets convicted, he gets XX yrs in prison.
If someone kills a person and he allegedly has a bias/hate for that person, then it's XX + 5years.
Is the person, who was randomly killed any less dead, than the targeted individual? Are their lives less valuable?
I think most people would be more concerned about someone randomly killing people. How does anyone avoid a random killing?
The whole concept of "Hate" crimes had PC origins, which allows the Legal System to participate in virtue signaling. Symbolism over substance runs rampant.
BNI isn't black. He pretends to be, but was outed a while ago as a lily white BLM loser pushing his white guilt on everyone.Jussie Smollett just got convicted on 5 of 6 charges, which each had a 3 year jail term.
He was given only 150 days in jail. Was that white privilege?
I thought that was Bob?BNI isn't black. He pretends to be, but was outed a while ago as a lily white BLM loser pushing his white guilt on everyone.
Both. Bob just has a thing for pedophiles.I thought that was Bob?
Of course your school taught that stuff like they did in mine and every one else’s school back in the day and no one thought nothing of it. I guess cancel culture is alive and well today, because in some school districts parts of black history is getting removed or attempted to under the guise of CRT.
It is not naive. You really think 3rd graders are discussing court cases like Plessy vs. Ferguson, Dredd Scott Decision, or Brown vs Board of Education? Even non high school history class. Those were mentioned in our history books but far from any CRT type depth.
The parents that claim that CRT is being taught in schools do. Some parents in Pennsylvania last year tried to get children's books about Rosa Parks and MLK removed from the school library. These so called anti-CRT parents are trying to get rid of anything about black history that puts white people in a bad light. The topic of CRT was a big part in the election of Youngkin in Virginia. Desantis banned it in FL. It has been a Faux News talking point for almost 2 years now.Google pedagogy.
Again, your lies and bad faith are showing. No one thinks schools shouldn't discusss Plessy v. Ferguson, etc.
You are just making strawmen, equating MLK to CRT.
Its the pedagogy.